Cheryl M. Wong
- Clinical Psychology top 1%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Behavioral Neuroscience top 5%
- Cultural Studies top 1%
- Co-authors
- Sarah L. HalliganRachel YehudaEric HollanderStephanie SeremetisIlyse L. SpertusConcetta DeCariaRobert GrossmanTomer Begaz
- Topics
- Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (9 papers)Gambling Behavior and Treatments (3 papers)Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomSouth Africa
In The Last Decade
Cheryl M. Wong
13 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
- Clinical Psychology 1.1k
- Psychiatry and Mental health 290
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 137
- Behavioral Neuroscience 135
- Cultural Studies 120
Countries citing papers authored by Cheryl M. Wong
This map shows the geographic impact of Cheryl M. Wong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cheryl M. Wong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cheryl M. Wong more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Cheryl M. Wong
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cheryl M. Wong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cheryl M. Wong. The network helps show where Cheryl M. Wong may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cheryl M. Wong
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cheryl M. Wong. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cheryl M. Wong based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cheryl M. Wong. Cheryl M. Wong is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 375 | |
| 2 | 35 | |
| 3 | 129 | |
| 4 | 188 | |
| 5 | 187 | |
| 6 | 128 | |
| 7 | 36 | |
| 8 | 42 | |
| 9 | 101 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | The relationship between executive function impairment and serotonergic sensitivity in obsessive-compulsive disorder | 10 |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | Diagnosis, neurobiology, and treatment of pathological gambling. | 87 |
| 14 | 5 |
About Cheryl M. Wong
Cheryl M. Wong is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Behavioral Neuroscience and Developmental Neuroscience, having authored 14 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (9 papers), Gambling Behavior and Treatments (3 papers) and Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (1.1k citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (135 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (290 citations). Cheryl M. Wong has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Sarah L. Halligan, Rachel Yehuda, Eric Hollander, Stephanie Seremetis, Ilyse L. Spertus, Concetta DeCaria, Robert Grossman, Tomer Begaz, Jee Hyun Kwon and Charles P. Cartwright. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Psychiatry, Biological Psychiatry and Child Abuse & Neglect.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.