Thomas Rinne

1.7k total citations
26 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Thomas Rinne is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology and Behavioral Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas Rinne has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Clinical Psychology, 9 papers in Social Psychology and 4 papers in Behavioral Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Thomas Rinne's work include Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (13 papers), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (10 papers) and Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (6 papers). Thomas Rinne is often cited by papers focused on Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (13 papers), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (10 papers) and Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (6 papers). Thomas Rinne collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Canada. Thomas Rinne's co-authors include Wim van den Brink, L. Wouters, Jaap G. Goekoop, E. R. de Kloet, Richard van Dyck, Roel H. DeRijk, Edwin de Beurs, Arne Popma, Dirk L. Knol and Robert Vermeiren and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, American Journal of Psychiatry and Biological Psychiatry.

In The Last Decade

Thomas Rinne

25 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Thomas Rinne Netherlands 12 795 250 244 223 170 26 1.1k
Nicole Schlosser Germany 21 835 1.1× 263 1.1× 299 1.2× 175 0.8× 232 1.4× 29 1.2k
Marina Díaz‐Marsá Spain 20 806 1.0× 362 1.4× 88 0.4× 146 0.7× 162 1.0× 105 1.1k
Kirsten Terfehr Germany 15 463 0.6× 142 0.6× 202 0.8× 103 0.5× 123 0.7× 17 735
Charlotte Gayer‐Anderson United Kingdom 19 702 0.9× 822 3.3× 147 0.6× 316 1.4× 302 1.8× 42 1.5k
Christoph Mensebach Germany 15 760 1.0× 340 1.4× 113 0.5× 104 0.5× 195 1.1× 23 1.0k
Rosetta Nicastro Switzerland 21 970 1.2× 459 1.8× 154 0.6× 173 0.8× 154 0.9× 47 1.5k
Sandra M. Goulding United States 19 486 0.6× 788 3.2× 89 0.4× 272 1.2× 176 1.0× 35 1.2k
K Binder-Brynes United States 8 659 0.8× 167 0.7× 300 1.2× 117 0.5× 62 0.4× 9 995
Deborah J. Walder United States 21 359 0.5× 581 2.3× 290 1.2× 159 0.7× 158 0.9× 30 1.3k
Naomi E. Lohr United States 18 1.3k 1.6× 272 1.1× 73 0.3× 198 0.9× 129 0.8× 26 1.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Rinne

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Rinne's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Rinne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Rinne more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Rinne

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Rinne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Rinne. The network helps show where Thomas Rinne may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas Rinne

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas Rinne. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas Rinne based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas Rinne. Thomas Rinne is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Rinne, Thomas, et al.. (2018). [How reliable are the predictors of sexual recidivism? Moral considerations can colour the judgement of pro Justitia reporters].. PubMed. 60(2). 78–86.
2.
Rossegger, Astrid, et al.. (2017). Das Violent Extremism Risk Assessment Version 2 Revised (VERA-2R) : eine Skala zur Beurteilung des Risikos extremistischer Gewalt ; Deutsche Übersetzung.. 71(5). 335–342. 2 indexed citations
3.
El, Carla van, Maaike Kempes, J.I.M. Egger, et al.. (2014). Neuroimaging in the Courtroom: Normative Frameworks and Consensual Practices. AJOB Neuroscience. 5(2). 37–39. 1 indexed citations
4.
Rinne, Thomas, et al.. (2014). The DAPP–SF as a Screener for Personality Disorder in a Forensic Setting. Journal of Personality Assessment. 97(2). 172–181. 1 indexed citations
5.
Gronde, Toon van der, Maaike Kempes, Carla van El, Thomas Rinne, & Toine Pieters. (2014). Neurobiological Correlates in Forensic Assessment: A Systematic Review. PLoS ONE. 9(10). e110672–e110672. 22 indexed citations
6.
Vinkers, David J., Jean‐Paul Selten, Hans W. Hoek, & Thomas Rinne. (2013). Psychotic disorders are more common in ethnic minority than in Dutch native defendants. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. 48(9). 1399–1404. 4 indexed citations
7.
Vinkers, David J., et al.. (2011). [Ethnic differences between pre-trial suspected offenders].. PubMed. 53(11). 801–11. 3 indexed citations
8.
Vinkers, David J., et al.. (2011). The relationship between mental disorders and different types of crime. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health. 21(5). 307–320. 51 indexed citations
9.
Klaassens, Ellen R., Tineke van Veen, Erik J. Giltay, et al.. (2010). Trauma exposure and hypothalamic–pituitary– adrenal axis functioning in mentally healthy Dutch peacekeeping veterans, 10–25 years after deployment. Journal of Traumatic Stress. 23(1). 124–131. 7 indexed citations
10.
Vinkers, David J., et al.. (2010). Pre-trial psychiatric evaluations and ethnicity in the Netherlands. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry. 33(3). 192–196. 16 indexed citations
11.
Beurs, Edwin de, Thomas Rinne, Dirk van Kampen, Roel Verheul, & Helene Andrea. (2010). Criterion‐related validity of the DAPP‐SF and its utility as a screener for personality disorders in outpatient care. Personality and Mental Health. 4(4). 271–283. 4 indexed citations
12.
Beurs, Edwin de, et al.. (2009). MMPI profiles of males accused of severe crimes: a cluster analysis. Psychology Crime and Law. 15(5). 441–450. 11 indexed citations
13.
Beurs, Edwin de, et al.. (2009). Reliability and Validity of the Dutch Dimensional Assessment of Personality Pathology-Short Form (DAPP-SF), A Shortened Version of the DAPP-Basic Questionnaire. Journal of Personality Disorders. 23(3). 308–326. 27 indexed citations
14.
Ingenhoven, Theo, et al.. (2009). Effectiveness of Pharmacotherapy for Severe Personality Disorders. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 71(1). 14–25. 89 indexed citations
15.
Urbaniok, Frank, Thomas Rinne, Leonhard Held, Astrid Rossegger, & Jérôme Endrass. (2008). Forensische Risikokalkulationen: Grundlegende methodische Aspekte zur Beurteilung der Anwendbarkeit und Validität verschiedener Verfahren. Fortschritte der Neurologie · Psychiatrie. 76(8). 470–477. 5 indexed citations
16.
Popma, Arne, Robert Vermeiren, Charlotte Geluk, et al.. (2006). Cortisol Moderates the Relationship between Testosterone and Aggression in Delinquent Male Adolescents. Biological Psychiatry. 61(3). 405–411. 217 indexed citations
17.
Rinne, Thomas, E. R. de Kloet, L. Wouters, et al.. (2003). Fluvoxamine Reduces Responsiveness of HPA Axis in Adult Female BPD Patients with a History of Sustained Childhood Abuse. Neuropsychopharmacology. 28(1). 126–132. 41 indexed citations
18.
19.
Rinne, Thomas, Wim van den Brink, L. Wouters, & Richard van Dyck. (2002). SSRI Treatment of Borderline Personality Disorder: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial for Female Patients With Borderline Personality Disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry. 159(12). 2048–2054. 134 indexed citations
20.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Nicole Schlosser Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Marina Díaz‐Marsá Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Kirsten Terfehr Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Charlotte Gayer‐Anderson Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Christoph Mensebach Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Rosetta Nicastro Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sandra M. Goulding Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by K Binder-Brynes Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Deborah J. Walder Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Naomi E. Lohr
Rankless by CCL
2026