Cheryl Lawther
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Gender Studies top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations
- Social Psychology
- History top 10%
- Topics
- Irish and British Studies (11 papers)Cambodian History and Society (8 papers)Gender, Security, and Conflict (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Cheryl Lawther
19 papers receiving 124 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
- Sociology and Political Science 122
- Gender Studies 49
- Political Science and International Relations 37
- Social Psychology 26
- History 15
Countries citing papers authored by Cheryl Lawther
This map shows the geographic impact of Cheryl Lawther's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cheryl Lawther with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cheryl Lawther more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Cheryl Lawther
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cheryl Lawther. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cheryl Lawther. The network helps show where Cheryl Lawther may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cheryl Lawther
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cheryl Lawther. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cheryl Lawther based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cheryl Lawther. Cheryl Lawther is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | ‘Let me tell you’: Transitional Justice, Victimhood and Dealing with a Contested Past | 2 |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 8 | |
| 9 | "No Longer Neighbours" - The Impact of Violence on Land, Housing and Redress in the Northern Ireland Conflict | 3 |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | Alternative Sanctions Before The Special Jurisdiction For Peace: Reflections on International Law and Transitional Justice | 0 |
| 12 | The Limits of the Law: Putting Reparations into Practice | 1 |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 13 | |
| 15 | 0 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | Truth, Denial and Transition: Northern Ireland and the Contested Past | 39 |
| 18 | 22 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 15 |
About Cheryl Lawther
Cheryl Lawther is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 24 papers that have together received 152 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Irish and British Studies (11 papers), Cambodian History and Society (8 papers) and Gender, Security, and Conflict (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (49 citations), Sociology and Political Science (122 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (37 citations). Cheryl Lawther has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Michelle Butler, Luke Moffett, Kieran McEvoy, Peter Dixon and Clara Sandoval. Their work appears in journals such as The British Journal of Criminology, Political Geography and Policing & Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.