Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Evaluating the enablers and barriers for successful implementation of sustainable business practice in ‘lean’ SMEs
2019294 citationsSavindi Caldera, Cheryl Desha et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Cheryl Desha's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cheryl Desha with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cheryl Desha more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cheryl Desha. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cheryl Desha. The network helps show where Cheryl Desha may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cheryl Desha
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cheryl Desha.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cheryl Desha based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Cheryl Desha. Cheryl Desha is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Desha, Cheryl & Savindi Caldera. (2019). Foundations and Horizons: The Critical Role of International Coursework to Engage Students in Engineering for the 21 st Century. Griffith Research Online (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia). 1261.2 indexed citations
14.
Desha, Cheryl, et al.. (2016). Urban nature for resilient and liveable cities [Editorial]. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment.1 indexed citations
15.
Hargroves, Karlson, Michael Smith, Anna Bella Siriban Manalang, et al.. (2014). Decoupling 2: Technologies, opportunities and policy options. QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology).51 indexed citations
16.
Desha, Cheryl & Bouchra Senadji. (2014). Holistically approaching curriculum renewal: A case study of the Queensland University of Technology. QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology). 133.1 indexed citations
17.
Desha, Cheryl, et al.. (2013). State of Energy Efficiency Education in Australian Technical & Further Education (TAFE) : A Report to the Australian Government Skills for the Carbon Challenge Initiative, The Natural Edge Project (TNEP), Queensland University of Technology. Science & Engineering Faculty.1 indexed citations
18.
Newman, Peter, et al.. (2012). Reducing the environmental impact of road construction. QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology).11 indexed citations
19.
Smith, Michael B., Karlson Hargroves, Cheryl Desha, & Peter Stasinopoulos. (2009). Water transformed: Sustainable water solutions for climate change adaptation. QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology).4 indexed citations
20.
Hargroves, Karlson, et al.. (2007). Energy transformed: Sustainable energy solutions for climate change mitigation. QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology).17 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.