Benjamin T. Montet

3.4k citations
49 papers · 840 indexed · h-index 17

Benjamin T. Montet

42 papers receiving 732 citations

Peers

Benjamin T. Montet
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
  • Instrumentation 376
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 806
  • Computational Mechanics 58
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 27
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 38
Replace Leigh C. Smith with:
Leigh C. Smith United Kingdom
T. L. Campante United Kingdom
T. Arentoft Denmark
Elisa V. Quintana United States
R. F. Díaz France
J. M. Almenara France
A. Henden United States
Sarah L. Martell Australia
M. Pawlak Poland
Mikkel N. Lund Denmark
Benjamin T. Montet relative to Leigh C. Smith United Kingdom Leigh C. Smith's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.7×
Leigh C. Smith · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin T. Montet

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin T. Montet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin T. Montet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin T. Montet more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin T. Montet

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin T. Montet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin T. Montet. The network helps show where Benjamin T. Montet may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Benjamin T. Montet, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Benjamin T. Montet Line = papers co-authored together Benjamin T. Montet links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 202411
3 20248
4 20247
5 202418
6 20243
7 20240
8 20242
9 20233
10 202235
11 202227
12
eleanor: Extracted and systematics-corrected light curves for TESS-observed stars
20191
13 20182
14 201710
15 201725
16 201722
17 201521
18 201515
19 201510
20
LHS 6343: Precise Constraints on the Mass and Radius of a Transiting Brown Dwarf Discovered by Kepler
20141

About Benjamin T. Montet

Benjamin T. Montet is a scholar working on Instrumentation, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Computational Mechanics, having authored 49 papers that have together received 840 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (45 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (28 papers), Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (23 papers), Astro and Planetary Science (14 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (9 papers), Astronomical Observations and Instrumentation (6 papers), Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (3 papers) and Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (376 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (806 citations) and Computational Mechanics (58 citations). Benjamin T. Montet has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and France. Frequent co-authors include John Asher Johnson, Andrew W. Howard, Justin R. Crepp, Timothy D. Morton, Luan Ghezzi, Philip S. Muirhead, Daniel Foreman-Mackey, Sasha Hinkley, Konstantin Batygin and Henry Ngo. Their work appears in journals such as The Astrophysical Journal, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society and The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026