A. Choplin

1.1k total citations
43 papers, 662 citations indexed

About

A. Choplin is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Instrumentation. According to data from OpenAlex, A. Choplin has authored 43 papers receiving a total of 662 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 36 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 21 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics and 11 papers in Instrumentation. Recurrent topics in A. Choplin's work include Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (31 papers), Nuclear physics research studies (18 papers) and Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (14 papers). A. Choplin is often cited by papers focused on Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (31 papers), Nuclear physics research studies (18 papers) and Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (14 papers). A. Choplin collaborates with scholars based in Belgium, Switzerland and Japan. A. Choplin's co-authors include S. Goriely, L. Siess, G. Meynet, Raphaël Hirschi, Sylvia Ekström, Á. Skúladóttir, C. J. Hansen, Stefania Salvadori, C. Georgy and A. Maeder and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and The Astrophysical Journal.

In The Last Decade

A. Choplin

40 papers receiving 589 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
A. Choplin Belgium	15	563	208	199	44	30	43	662
Charli M. Sakari United States	15	370 0.7×	73 0.4×	150 0.8×	8 0.2×	7 0.2×	35	404
Marius Eichler Germany	8	370 0.7×	310 1.5×	24 0.1×	39 0.9×	40 1.3×	13	505
Stelios Tsangarides United Kingdom	8	1.1k 2.0×	138 0.7×	485 2.4×	8 0.2×	6 0.2×	12	1.2k
Nicole Vassh United States	9	212 0.4×	216 1.0×	24 0.1×	48 1.1×	34 1.1×	19	360
A. M. Soderberg United States	21	1.5k 2.7×	551 2.6×	86 0.4×	7 0.2×	7 0.2×	43	1.6k
S. D. Vergani France	16	804 1.4×	209 1.0×	88 0.4×	8 0.2×	5 0.2×	68	831
B. Sbarufatti Italy	21	1.1k 1.9×	590 2.8×	68 0.3×	13 0.3×	3 0.1×	78	1.1k
Amedeo Tornambé Italy	19	1.1k 2.0×	186 0.9×	278 1.4×	4 0.1×	6 0.2×	88	1.2k
S. E. Woosley United States	7	857 1.5×	265 1.3×	129 0.6×	6 0.1×	8 0.3×	9	893
B. S. Carter South Africa	12	546 1.0×	80 0.4×	118 0.6×	10 0.2×	11 0.4×	20	563

Countries citing papers authored by A. Choplin

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A. Choplin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. Choplin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. Choplin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by A. Choplin

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. Choplin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. Choplin. The network helps show where A. Choplin may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of A. Choplin

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A. Choplin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A. Choplin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with A. Choplin. A. Choplin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Meynet, G., Eoin Farrell, Yutaka Hirai, et al.. (2025). Fluorine production in He-burning regions of massive stars during cosmic history. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 696. A241–A241. 1 indexed citations

Eck, S. Van, T. Merle, Drisya Karinkuzhi, et al.. (2024). From the s-Process to the i-Process: A New Perspective on the Chemical Enrichment of Extrinsic Stars. Galaxies. 12(6). 89–89. 2 indexed citations

Choplin, A., L. Siess, S. Goriely, & Sébastien Martinet. (2024). Production of Lithium and Heavy Elements in AGB Stars Experiencing PIEs. Galaxies. 12(5). 66–66. 3 indexed citations

Larsen, A. C., P. von Neumann–Cosel, Елена Литвинова, et al.. (2024). Systematic study of the low-lying electric dipole strength in Sn isotopes and its astrophysical implications. Physical review. C. 109(5). 6 indexed citations

Choplin, A., et al.. (2024). Proton ingestion in asymptotic giant branch stars as a possible explanation for J-type stars and AB2 grains. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 691. L7–L7. 2 indexed citations

Hirai, Yutaka, Sylvia Ekström, Eoin Farrell, et al.. (2024). Rapidly rotating Population III stellar models as a source of primary nitrogen. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 687. A307–A307. 17 indexed citations

Choplin, A., et al.. (2024). The intermediate neutron capture process. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 684. A206–A206. 13 indexed citations

Karinkuzhi, Drisya, S. Van Eck, S. Goriely, et al.. (2023). Does the i-process operate at nearly solar metallicity?. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 677. A47–A47. 7 indexed citations

Choplin, A., S. Courtin, M. Heine, et al.. (2023). A new ¹²C+¹²C reaction rate: Impact on stellar evolution. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 279. 11016–11016.

10.

Goriely, S., et al.. (2023). Progress in Nuclear Astrophysics: a multi-disciplinary field with still many open questions. Journal of Physics Conference Series. 2586(1). 12104–12104. 1 indexed citations

11.

Choplin, A., L. Siess, & S. Goriely. (2023). The intermediate neutron-capture process in AGB stars. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 279. 7001–7001. 4 indexed citations

12.

Adsley, P., A. M. Laird, R. Longland, et al.. (2022). The impact of 17O + α reaction rate uncertainties on the s-process in rotating massive stars. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 514(2). 2650–2657. 6 indexed citations

13.

Choplin, A., L. Siess, & S. Goriely. (2022). The intermediate neutron capture process. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 667. A155–A155. 30 indexed citations

14.

Choplin, A., L. Siess, & S. Goriely. (2021). The intermediate neutron capture process. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 648. A119–A119. 55 indexed citations

15.

Skúladóttir, Á., et al.. (2020). Neutron-capture elements in dwarf galaxies. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 634. A84–A84. 19 indexed citations

16.

Choplin, A., Nozomu Tominaga, & Miho N. Ishigaki. (2019). Inferring the velocity of early massive stars from the abundances of extremely metal-poor stars. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 12 indexed citations

17.

Skúladóttir, Á., C. J. Hansen, Stefania Salvadori, & A. Choplin. (2019). Neutron-capture elements in dwarf galaxies. I. Chemical clocks and the short timescale of the r-process. Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles). 12 indexed citations

18.

Choplin, A.. (2018). Non-standard s-process in massive rotating stars - Yields of 10–150 M⊙ models at Z = 10E−3. White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York). 59 indexed citations

19.

Choplin, A., Raphaël Hirschi, G. Meynet, & Sylvia Ekström. (2017). Are some CEMP-s stars the daughters of spinstars?. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 607. L3–L3. 33 indexed citations

20.

Choplin, A., A. Maeder, G. Meynet, & C. Chiappini. (2016). Constraints on CEMP-no progenitors from nuclear astrophysics. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 23 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact