Charles W. Wright

514 total citations
11 papers, 190 citations indexed

About

Charles W. Wright is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Charles W. Wright has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 190 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 1 paper in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 1 paper in Health. Recurrent topics in Charles W. Wright's work include Healthcare Policy and Management (1 paper), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (1 paper) and Religious Education and Schools (1 paper). Charles W. Wright is often cited by papers focused on Healthcare Policy and Management (1 paper), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (1 paper) and Religious Education and Schools (1 paper). Charles W. Wright collaborates with scholars based in United States and Canada. Charles W. Wright's co-authors include Axel Honneth, Pablo de Greiff, Mary E. Byrnes, Galina Gheihman, Alan C. Acock, Mark Dobrow, T. G. Stœbe, Cy Frank and Susan Brien and has published in prestigious journals such as The Philosophical Review, MRS Bulletin and Social Problems.

In The Last Decade

Charles W. Wright

11 papers receiving 149 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Charles W. Wright United States	5	118	35	28	22	19	11	190
Leonidas Donskis Lithuania	7	98 0.8×	44 1.3×	17 0.6×	14 0.6×	13 0.7×	35	166
Adrienne D. Davis United States	7	120 1.0×	24 0.7×	28 1.0×	15 0.7×	17 0.9×	22	193
Sally J. Scholz United States	8	84 0.7×	49 1.4×	15 0.5×	30 1.4×	17 0.9×	31	202
Elizabeth A. Meese	5	74 0.6×	13 0.4×	21 0.8×	27 1.2×	12 0.6×	8	206
Peter M. Schuller	2	81 0.7×	55 1.6×	12 0.4×	59 2.7×	11 0.6×	4	224
Linda Shopes United Kingdom	6	156 1.3×	37 1.1×	32 1.1×	24 1.1×	7 0.4×	15	276
Hans Peter Dreitzel	8	97 0.8×	24 0.7×	23 0.8×	19 0.9×	12 0.6×	22	221
René Moelker Netherlands	6	86 0.7×	39 1.1×	33 1.2×	9 0.4×	34 1.8×	30	160
Victor Brombert United States	8	84 0.7×	26 0.7×	12 0.4×	21 1.0×	10 0.5×	56	242
JoAnn Chirico United States	4	128 1.1×	57 1.6×	11 0.4×	27 1.2×	7 0.4×	9	188

Countries citing papers authored by Charles W. Wright

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Charles W. Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles W. Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles W. Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Charles W. Wright

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles W. Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles W. Wright. The network helps show where Charles W. Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Charles W. Wright

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Charles W. Wright. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Charles W. Wright based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Charles W. Wright. Charles W. Wright is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

Brien, Susan, Galina Gheihman, Mary E. Byrnes, et al.. (2014). A Scoping Review of Appropriateness of Care Research Activity in Canada from a Health System-Level Perspective. Healthcare policy. 9(4). 48–61. 8 indexed citations

2.

Wright, Charles W., et al.. (2012). Measuring the Sublime. Teaching Philosophy. 35(4). 383–409. 1 indexed citations

3.

Wright, Charles W.. (2004). Particularity and Perspective Taking: On Feminism and Habermas's Discourse Theory of Morality. Hypatia. 19(4). 49–76. 12 indexed citations

4.

Wright, Charles W.. (2004). Particularity and Perspective Taking: On Feminism and Habermas's Discourse Theory of Morality. Hypatia. 19(4). 47–74. 1 indexed citations

5.

Stœbe, T. G. & Charles W. Wright. (1997). Packaging: Materials Science for All of Us. MRS Bulletin. 22(4). 43–43. 1 indexed citations

6.

Greiff, Pablo de, Axel Honneth, & Charles W. Wright. (1997). The Fragmented World of the Social: Essays in Social and Political Philosophy.. The Philosophical Review. 106(4). 605–605. 129 indexed citations

7.

Wright, Charles W., et al.. (1991). Reasons for Not Reporting Peak Experiences. Journal of Humanistic Psychology. 31(1). 86–94. 26 indexed citations

8.

Wright, Charles W.. (1984). Constructions of deviance in sociological theory: The problem of commensurability. 2 indexed citations

9.

Acock, Alan C., et al.. (1981). Predicting intolerance: The impact of parents’ own tolerance vs. social class and religious fundamentalism. Deviant Behavior. 3(1). 65–84. 3 indexed citations

10.

Wright, Charles W., et al.. (1980). Value Implications of the Functional Theory of Deviance. Social Problems. 28(2). 205–219. 6 indexed citations

11.

Wright, Charles W., et al.. (1978). CONTRASTING CONCEPTIONS OF DEVIANCE IN SOCIOLOGY: FUNCTIONALISM AND LABELLING THEORY. The British Journal of Criminology. 18(3). 217–231. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact