Ruth Barcan
- Sociology and Political Science
- Education
- Gender Studies
- General Health Professions
- Political Science and International Relations
- Topics
- Gender, Feminism, and Media (4 papers)Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (3 papers)Geographies of human-animal interactions (2 papers)
In The Last Decade
Ruth Barcan
21 papers receiving 168 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Sociology and Political Science 74
- Education 40
- Gender Studies 32
- General Health Professions 22
- Political Science and International Relations 21
Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Barcan
This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Barcan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Barcan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Barcan more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Barcan
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Barcan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Barcan. The network helps show where Ruth Barcan may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ruth Barcan
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ruth Barcan. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ruth Barcan based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ruth Barcan. Ruth Barcan is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 13 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 21 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | Natural Histories: Gender, Race and Regional Consciousness on the Gold Coast | 1 |
| 11 | Dirty Spaces: Communication and Contamination in Men's Public Toilets 1 | 10 |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | Female exposure and the protesting woman | 5 |
| 14 | In the raw : 'home-made' porn and reality genres | 13 |
| 15 | 12 | |
| 16 | 6 | |
| 17 | Imagining Australian Space: Cultural Studies and Spatial Inquiry | 10 |
| 18 | Hansonism, 'Caring' and the Lament for Modernity | 1 |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | Big Things: Consumer Totemism and Serial Monumentality | 3 |
About Ruth Barcan
Ruth Barcan is a scholar working on Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Geography, Planning and Development and Gender Studies, having authored 27 papers that have together received 199 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender, Feminism, and Media (4 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (3 papers) and Geographies of human-animal interactions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (32 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (16 citations) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (12 citations). Ruth Barcan has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Lithuania and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Ian Buchanan, Leah Gibbs, Adriana Vergés, Michael Adams, Astrida Neimanis and Sarah M. Hamylton. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Cultural Studies, Continuum and Journal of international women's studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.