Countries citing papers authored by Charles L. Isbell
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Charles L. Isbell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles L. Isbell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles L. Isbell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Charles L. Isbell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles L. Isbell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles L. Isbell. The network helps show where Charles L. Isbell may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Charles L. Isbell
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Charles L. Isbell.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Charles L. Isbell based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Charles L. Isbell. Charles L. Isbell is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Isbell, Charles L., et al.. (2018). Imitating Latent Policies from Observation. International Conference on Machine Learning. 1755–1763.1 indexed citations
2.
Isbell, Charles L., et al.. (2017). State Aware Imitation Learning. Neural Information Processing Systems. 30. 2911–2920.8 indexed citations
Grover, Ishaan, et al.. (2015). Policy shaping with human teachers. International Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 3366–3372.36 indexed citations
6.
Scholz, Jonathan, et al.. (2014). A Physics-Based Model Prior for Object-Oriented MDPs. International Conference on Machine Learning. 1089–1097.22 indexed citations
Isbell, Charles L., et al.. (2013). Point Based Value Iteration with Optimal Belief Compression for Dec-POMDPs. Neural Information Processing Systems. 26. 100–108.10 indexed citations
Roberts, David L., et al.. (2009). Learning to Influence Emotional Responses for Interactive Storytelling. National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 95–102.12 indexed citations
Roberts, David L., et al.. (2007). Authorial idioms for target distributions in TTD-MDPs. National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 852–857.13 indexed citations
14.
Isbell, Charles L., et al.. (2007). Managing domain knowledge and multiple models with boosting. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 1144–1149.1 indexed citations
15.
Gray, Alexander, et al.. (2007). Ultrafast Monte Carlo for kernel estimators and generalized statistical summations. Neural Information Processing Systems. 673–680.6 indexed citations
16.
Isbell, Charles L., et al.. (2000). Cobot in LambdaMOO: A Social Statistics Agent. National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 36–41.41 indexed citations
17.
Husbands, Parry, Charles L. Isbell, & Alan Edelman. (1999). MITMatlab: A Tool for Interactive Supercomputing.. PPSC.3 indexed citations
18.
Isbell, Charles L. & Parry Husbands. (1999). The Parallel Problems Server: an Interactive Tool for Large Scale Machine Learning. Neural Information Processing Systems. 12. 703–709.
19.
Isbell, Charles L. & Paul Viola. (1998). Restructuring Sparse High Dimensional Data for Effective Retrieval. DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology). 11. 480–486.37 indexed citations
20.
Bonet, Jeremy S. De, Charles L. Isbell, & Paul Viola. (1996). MIMIC: Finding Optima by Estimating Probability Densities. Neural Information Processing Systems. 9. 424–430.299 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.