Charles L. Duncan
- Infectious Diseases top 0.5%
- Food Science top 1%
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Biotechnology top 1%
- Immunology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Dorothy H. StrongE. M. FosterRonald G. LabbéJun SakùraiJ L McDonelJulian I. RoodEileen B. SomersM Sébald
- Topics
- Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research (46 papers)Probiotics and Fermented Foods (23 papers)Gut microbiota and health (14 papers)
- Journals
- Applied and Environmental MicrobiologyJournal of BacteriologyJournal of Clinical Microbiology
- Partner nations
- United StatesFrance
In The Last Decade
Charles L. Duncan
65 papers receiving 2.0k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
- Infectious Diseases 1.7k
- Food Science 897
- Molecular Biology 818
- Biotechnology 493
- Immunology 346
Countries citing papers authored by Charles L. Duncan
This map shows the geographic impact of Charles L. Duncan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles L. Duncan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles L. Duncan more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Charles L. Duncan
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles L. Duncan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles L. Duncan. The network helps show where Charles L. Duncan may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Charles L. Duncan
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Charles L. Duncan. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Charles L. Duncan based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Charles L. Duncan. Charles L. Duncan is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25 | |
| 2 | 22 | |
| 3 | 74 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | 61 | |
| 7 | 12 | |
| 8 | 22 | |
| 9 | 29 | |
| 10 | 52 | |
| 11 | 61 | |
| 12 | 36 | |
| 13 | 13 | |
| 14 | 35 | |
| 15 | 20 | |
| 16 | 58 | |
| 17 | 36 | |
| 18 | Improved Medium for Sporulation of Clostridium perfringensbreakdown → | 337 |
| 19 | 27 | |
| 20 | 16 |
About Charles L. Duncan
Charles L. Duncan is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Biotechnology and Pharmacology, having authored 66 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research (46 papers), Probiotics and Fermented Foods (23 papers) and Gut microbiota and health (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Infectious Diseases (1.7k citations), Biotechnology (493 citations) and Food Science (897 citations). Charles L. Duncan has collaborated with scholars based in United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Dorothy H. Strong, E. M. Foster, Ronald G. Labbé, Jun Sakùrai, J L McDonel, Julian I. Rood, Eileen B. Somers, M Sébald, Virginia N. Scott and R.G. Labbé. Their work appears in journals such as Applied and Environmental Microbiology, Journal of Bacteriology and Journal of Clinical Microbiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.