Charles J. Dunlap
-
- Military and Defense Studies 8
- International Law and Human Rights 7
- Global Peace and Security Dynamics 4
- Military History and Strategy 3
- Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies 3
- European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies 2
-
- War, Ethics, and Justification 3
-
- Torture, Ethics, and Law 5
- Partner nations
- United StatesLatvia
In The Last Decade
Charles J. Dunlap
19 papers receiving 93 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
- Political Science and International Relations 94
- Space and Planetary Science 2
- Philosophy 17
- Fuel Technology 1
- Sociology and Political Science 49
Countries citing papers authored by Charles J. Dunlap
This map shows the geographic impact of Charles J. Dunlap's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles J. Dunlap with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles J. Dunlap more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Charles J. Dunlap
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles J. Dunlap. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles J. Dunlap. The network helps show where Charles J. Dunlap may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 3 scholars most cited alongside Charles J. Dunlap, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 0 | |
| 2 | DoD Law of War Manual and its Critics: Some Observations | 2016 | 1 |
| 3 | 2016 | 4 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 4 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 1 | |
| 6 | Some Reflections on the Intersection of Law and Ethics in Cyber War | 2013 | 2 |
| 7 | 2013 | 1 | |
| 8 | Law of War Manuals and Warfighting: A Perspective | 2012 | 1 |
| 9 | 2011 | 20 | |
| 10 | Lawfare Today … and Tomorrow | 2011 | 5 |
| 11 | Does Lawfare Need an Apologia | 2010 | 5 |
| 12 | Lawfare: A Decisive Element of 21st-Century Conflicts? | 2009 | 29 |
| 13 | Military Lawyering and Professional Independence in the War on Terror: A Response to David Luban | 2008 | 2 |
| 14 | 2008 | 3 | |
| 15 | Where Domestic Security and Civil Liberties Collide | 2000 | 1 |
| 16 | 1999 | 12 | |
| 17 | 1999 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1998 | 2 | |
| 19 | Melancholy Reunion: A Report from the Future on the Collapse of Civil-Military Relations in the United States. | 1996 | 3 |
| 20 | 1992 | 10 |
About Charles J. Dunlap
Charles J. Dunlap is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Philosophy and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 23 papers that have together received 130 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Military and Defense Studies (8 papers), International Law and Human Rights (7 papers), Torture, Ethics, and Law (5 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (4 papers), Military History and Strategy (3 papers), Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies (3 papers), War, Ethics, and Justification (3 papers) and European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (94 citations), Space and Planetary Science (2 citations) and Philosophy (17 citations). Charles J. Dunlap has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Latvia. Frequent co-authors include Michael W. Lewis, Eric Talbot Jensen and Geoffrey S. Corn.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.