Max Boot
Impact in
-
- International Relations and Foreign Policy
- Military History and Strategy
- Global Peace and Security Dynamics
- Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
- Military and Defense Studies
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Military and Defense Studies 4
- Military History and Strategy 2
- Global Peace and Security Dynamics 1
- International Relations in Latin America 1
- European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies 1
- Law 1
- Journals
- Foreign Affairs (6 papers)The Journal of Military History (1 paper)Foreign Policy (1 paper)Current History (1 paper)Medical Entomology and Zoology (1 paper)
In The Last Decade
Max Boot
16 papers receiving 120 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
- Political Science and International Relations 104
- Development 7
- Sociology and Political Science 83
- Anthropology 13
- Philosophy 13
Countries citing papers authored by Max Boot
This map shows the geographic impact of Max Boot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Max Boot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Max Boot more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Max Boot
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Max Boot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Max Boot. The network helps show where Max Boot may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 2 scholars most cited alongside Max Boot, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2003 | 40 | |
| 2 | 2002 | 39 | |
| 3 | 2005 | 12 | |
| 4 | 2000 | 10 | |
| 5 | 2004 | 10 | |
| 6 | The Road Not Taken: Edward Lansdale and the American Tragedy in Vietnam | 2018 | 10 |
| 7 | 2002 | 7 | |
| 8 | Myths About Neoconservatism | 2004 | 7 |
| 9 | 2003 | 7 | |
| 10 | Civilian Warriors: The Inside Story of Blackwater and the Unsung Heroes of the War on Terror | 2013 | 6 |
| 11 | The Evolution of Irregular War | 2013 | 5 |
| 12 | Countering Hybrid Warfare | 2015 | 5 |
| 13 | 2015 | 3 | |
| 14 | More small wars | 2014 | 2 |
| 15 | 2015 | 2 | |
| 16 | Out Of Order: Arrogance, Corruption, And Incompetence On The Bench | 1998 | 1 |
| 17 | La nueva forma estadounidense de hacer la guerra | 2003 | 0 |
About Max Boot
Max Boot is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Law, Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics and Mechanics of Materials, having authored 17 papers that have together received 166 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Military and Defense Studies (4 papers), Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (2 papers), Military History and Strategy (2 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (1 paper), Peacebuilding and International Security (1 paper), International Relations in Latin America (1 paper), Defense, Military, and Policy Studies (1 paper) and European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (104 citations), Development (7 citations), Sociology and Political Science (83 citations), Anthropology (13 citations) and Philosophy (13 citations). Frequent co-authors include William Shawcross and Thomas G. Weiss. Their work appears in journals such as Foreign Affairs, The Journal of Military History, Foreign Policy, Current History and Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.