Michael W. Lewis
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Plant Science top 2%
- Insect Science top 1%
- Genetics top 10%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Co-authors
- Nemat O. KeyhaniSarah J. LiljegrenMichelle E. LeslieArun WanchooBeth A. KrizekJoseph R. EckerDiane J. HolderBrett H. Kirkland
- Topics
- Plant Molecular Biology Research (12 papers)Plant Reproductive Biology (10 papers)Entomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control (4 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesJournal of Biological ChemistryNature Communications
- Partner nations
- United StatesPuerto RicoCanada
In The Last Decade
Michael W. Lewis
25 papers receiving 2.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
- Molecular Biology 1.4k
- Plant Science 1.4k
- Insect Science 454
- Genetics 220
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 57
Countries citing papers authored by Michael W. Lewis
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael W. Lewis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael W. Lewis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael W. Lewis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael W. Lewis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael W. Lewis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael W. Lewis. The network helps show where Michael W. Lewis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael W. Lewis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael W. Lewis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael W. Lewis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael W. Lewis. Michael W. Lewis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 24 | |
| 3 | 18 | |
| 4 | 55 | |
| 5 | 21 | |
| 6 | 12 | |
| 7 | 55 | |
| 8 | 32 | |
| 9 | 121 | |
| 10 | 18 | |
| 11 | 57 | |
| 12 | 94 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 112 | |
| 15 | 181 | |
| 16 | 225 | |
| 17 | 147 | |
| 18 | 105 | |
| 19 | 374 | |
| 20 | 122 |
About Michael W. Lewis
Michael W. Lewis is a scholar working on Plant Science, Insect Science and Molecular Biology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Molecular Biology Research (12 papers), Plant Reproductive Biology (10 papers) and Entomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (1.4k citations), Insect Science (454 citations) and Molecular Biology (1.4k citations). Michael W. Lewis has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Puerto Rico and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Nemat O. Keyhani, Sarah J. Liljegren, Michelle E. Leslie, Arun Wanchoo, Beth A. Krizek, Joseph R. Ecker, Diane J. Holder, Brett H. Kirkland, Sarah Hake and Jennifer C. Fletcher. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Nature Communications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.