Charles Feidelson

659 total citations
12 papers, 247 citations indexed

About

Charles Feidelson is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Political Science and International Relations and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Charles Feidelson has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 247 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Literature and Literary Theory, 2 papers in Political Science and International Relations and 1 paper in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Charles Feidelson's work include Themes in Literature Analysis (5 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (2 papers) and Rhetoric and Communication Studies (1 paper). Charles Feidelson is often cited by papers focused on Themes in Literature Analysis (5 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (2 papers) and Rhetoric and Communication Studies (1 paper). Charles Feidelson collaborates with scholars based in . Charles Feidelson's co-authors include William Rueckert, Richard Ellmann, David Lodge, Emily Dickinson, Charles R. Anderson, Richard Chase and Stephen E. Whicher and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, The Modern Language Review and American Literature.

In The Last Decade

Charles Feidelson

9 papers receiving 140 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Charles Feidelson 7 107 102 51 28 23 12 247
Richard Poirier Pakistan 11 87 0.8× 177 1.7× 54 1.1× 15 0.5× 42 1.8× 24 338
G. P. Mohrmann United States 9 172 1.6× 128 1.3× 33 0.6× 77 2.8× 17 0.7× 22 241
Thomas Kinsella 4 48 0.4× 72 0.7× 66 1.3× 20 0.7× 31 1.3× 16 213
William Empson United Kingdom 9 49 0.5× 123 1.2× 47 0.9× 7 0.3× 38 1.7× 36 267
C. A. Patrides United States 9 60 0.6× 84 0.8× 55 1.1× 12 0.4× 82 3.6× 46 314
William Whallon United States 8 27 0.3× 60 0.6× 45 0.9× 34 1.2× 23 1.0× 23 287
William Rueckert United States 5 205 1.9× 117 1.1× 87 1.7× 64 2.3× 11 0.5× 7 279
Pierre Saint-Amand 5 41 0.4× 102 1.0× 45 0.9× 10 0.4× 23 1.0× 23 209
Bruce A. Rosenberg United States 9 22 0.2× 64 0.6× 49 1.0× 20 0.7× 37 1.6× 36 219
Floyd L. Moreland 4 70 0.7× 35 0.3× 36 0.7× 8 0.3× 17 0.7× 7 192

Countries citing papers authored by Charles Feidelson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Charles Feidelson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles Feidelson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles Feidelson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Charles Feidelson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles Feidelson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles Feidelson. The network helps show where Charles Feidelson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Charles Feidelson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Charles Feidelson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Charles Feidelson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Charles Feidelson. Charles Feidelson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
1.
Lodge, David, Richard Ellmann, & Charles Feidelson. (1968). The Modern Tradition: Backgrounds of Modern Literature. The Modern Language Review. 63(4). 954–954. 23 indexed citations
2.
Feidelson, Charles. (1965). The Machine in the Garden: Technology and the Pastoral Ideal in America. Modern Language Quarterly. 26(2). 344–345. 29 indexed citations
3.
Feidelson, Charles & William Rueckert. (1964). Kenneth Burke and the Drama of Human Relations. American Literature. 36(2). 232–232. 115 indexed citations
4.
Feidelson, Charles, Emily Dickinson, & Charles R. Anderson. (1961). Emily Dickinson's Poetry; Stairway of Surprise.. Modern Language Notes. 76(8). 908–908. 22 indexed citations
5.
Feidelson, Charles, et al.. (1959). Interpretations of American literature. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 3 indexed citations
6.
Feidelson, Charles & Stephen E. Whicher. (1956). Freedom and Fate: An Inner Life of Ralph Waldo Emerson. Modern Language Notes. 71(1). 58–58. 1 indexed citations
7.
Feidelson, Charles, et al.. (1954). Symbolism and American Literature. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. 12(4). 529–529. 1 indexed citations
8.
Feidelson, Charles, et al.. (1954). Symbolism and American Literature.. American Quarterly. 6(1). 86–86. 7 indexed citations
9.
Feidelson, Charles, et al.. (1953). Symbolism and American Literature. Books Abroad. 27(4). 431–431.
10.
Chase, Richard & Charles Feidelson. (1953). Symbolism and American Literature.. American Literature. 25(3). 378–378. 1 indexed citations
11.
Feidelson, Charles. (1953). Symbolism and American literature. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 38 indexed citations
12.
Feidelson, Charles, et al.. (1953). Symbolism in American Literature. Chicago Review. 7(2). 84–84. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026