Charles E. Hambrick-Stowe
Impact in
- History top 2%
- Reformation and Early Modern Christianity
- Mormonism, Religion, and History
- Religious studies top 5%
- Religion, Gender, and Enlightenment
Papers in
-
- American Constitutional Law and Politics 10
- History 7
- Mormonism, Religion, and History 4
- Reformation and Early Modern Christianity 4
- Co-authors
- John M. Mulder (1 shared paper)David O. Morgan (1 shared paper)Mark A. Peterson (1 shared paper)Francis J. Bremer (2 shared papers)Randall Balmer (1 shared paper)Curtis D. Johnson (1 shared paper)Crawford Gribben (1 shared paper)Dewey D. Wallace (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of American History (4 papers)The American Historical Review (2 papers)American Literature (1 paper)The New England Quarterly (1 paper)Theology Today (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Charles E. Hambrick-Stowe
11 papers receiving 69 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
- History 64
- Religious studies 23
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 17
- Museology 11
- Political Science and International Relations 62
Countries citing papers authored by Charles E. Hambrick-Stowe
This map shows the geographic impact of Charles E. Hambrick-Stowe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles E. Hambrick-Stowe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles E. Hambrick-Stowe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Charles E. Hambrick-Stowe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles E. Hambrick-Stowe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles E. Hambrick-Stowe. The network helps show where Charles E. Hambrick-Stowe may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Charles E. Hambrick-Stowe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1983 | 47 | |
| 2 | 2001 | 43 | |
| 3 | 2008 | 14 | |
| 4 | 1999 | 13 | |
| 5 | 1996 | 10 | |
| 6 | 1983 | 10 | |
| 7 | 1983 | 5 | |
| 8 | 1997 | 3 | |
| 9 | 1992 | 2 | |
| 10 | 1998 | 1 | |
| 11 | Early New England Meditative Poetry | 1989 | 1 |
| 12 | 2000 | 0 | |
| 13 | 1983 | 0 |
About Charles E. Hambrick-Stowe
Charles E. Hambrick-Stowe is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, History, Religious studies, Sociology and Political Science and Geography, Planning and Development, having authored 13 papers that have together received 149 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American Constitutional Law and Politics (10 papers), Mormonism, Religion, and History (4 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (4 papers), Religion, Gender, and Enlightenment (3 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (2 papers) and Religious Tourism and Spaces (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History (64 citations), Religious studies (23 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (17 citations), Museology (11 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (62 citations). Charles E. Hambrick-Stowe has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include John M. Mulder, David O. Morgan, Mark A. Peterson, Francis J. Bremer, Randall Balmer, Curtis D. Johnson, Crawford Gribben, Dewey D. Wallace, Ann Hughes and John Coffey. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of American History, The American Historical Review, American Literature, The New England Quarterly and Theology Today.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.