This map shows the geographic impact of John Craig's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Craig with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Craig more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Craig. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Craig. The network helps show where John Craig may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Craig
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Craig.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Craig based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with John Craig. John Craig is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Lindsey, Peter A., Robert R. Alexander, Guy A. Balme, Neil Midlane, & John Craig. (2012). Possible relationships between the South African captive-bred lion hunting industry and the hunting and conservation of lions elsewhere in Africa : research article. African Journal of Wildlife Research. 42(1). 11–22.1 indexed citations
Craig, John. (1994). Replacement level fertility and future population growth.. PubMed. 20–2.18 indexed citations
14.
Eversley, D. E. C., Mike Coombes, Paul C. Cheshire, et al.. (1989). Counterurbanization in Europe: Discussion. Geographical Journal. 155(1). 75–75.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.