Charles E. Flower

1.3k citations
33 papers · 1.0k indexed · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Charles E. Flower

31 papers receiving 998 citations

Peers

Charles E. Flower
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Insect Science 319
  • Global and Planetary Change 543
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 262
  • Ecology 472
  • Soil Science 170
Replace Bradley Matthews with:
Bradley Matthews Austria
Volkmar Timmermann Norway
Jodi A. Forrester United States
Randy G. Jensen United States
Benjamin O. Knapp United States
Joanne Rebbeck United States
Zhaofei Fan United States
Khosro Sagheb‐Talebi Iran
Walter G. Thies United States
Kristofer Covey United States
Charles E. Flower relative to Bradley Matthews Austria Bradley Matthews's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.4×
Bradley Matthews · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Charles E. Flower

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Charles E. Flower's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles E. Flower with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles E. Flower more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Charles E. Flower

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles E. Flower. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles E. Flower. The network helps show where Charles E. Flower may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Charles E. Flower, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Charles E. Flower Line = papers co-authored together Charles E. Flower links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013189
2 2012127
3 2007120
4 2015110
5 200978
6 201355
7 201349
8 202148
9 200938
10 201728
11 201028
12 201823
13 201722
14 201518
15 202017
16 202312
17 201812
18 201812
19 20197
20 20176

About Charles E. Flower

Charles E. Flower is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Insect Science and Plant Science, having authored 33 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest Insect Ecology and Management (15 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (10 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (9 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (7 papers), Tree-ring climate responses (6 papers), Plant and Fungal Interactions Research (6 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (6 papers) and Forest ecology and management (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (319 citations), Global and Planetary Change (543 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (262 citations), Ecology (472 citations) and Soil Science (170 citations). Charles E. Flower has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Puerto Rico and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Miquel A. Gonzàlez‐Meler, Kathleen S. Knight, Peter S. Curtis, Christoph S. Vogel, Christopher M. Gough, Douglas J. Lynch, C. I. Czimczik, Jens‐Arne Subke, F. M. Hopkins and Jianwu Tang. Their work appears in journals such as Forests, Forest Ecology and Management, Urban forestry & urban greening, Oecologia and Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact