Increased tree carbon storage in response to nitrogen deposition in the US
- Journal
- Nature Geoscience
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/ngeo721 →Countries where authors are citing Increased tree carbon storage in response to nitrogen deposition in the US
This map shows the geographic impact of Increased tree carbon storage in response to nitrogen deposition in the US. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Increased tree carbon storage in response to nitrogen deposition in the US with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Increased tree carbon storage in response to nitrogen deposition in the US more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Increased tree carbon storage in response to nitrogen deposition in the US
This network shows the impact of Increased tree carbon storage in response to nitrogen deposition in the US. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Increased tree carbon storage in response to nitrogen deposition in the US.
About Increased tree carbon storage in response to nitrogen deposition in the US
This paper, published in 2009, received 579 indexed citations . Written by R. Quinn Thomas, Charles D. Canham, Kathleen C. Weathers and Christine L. Goodale covering the research area of Atmospheric Science and Global and Planetary Change. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Global and Planetary Change (288 citations), Soil Science (259 citations) and Ecology (184 citations). Published in Nature Geoscience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/ngeo721.