Charles C. Moul
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Marketing top 5%
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts top 1%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Statistics and Probability top 5%
- Co-authors
- Mark D. ManuszakJohn V. C. NyePatrick McAlvanahCharles B. WeinbergJanet WaskoS. Abraham RavidHarold L. VogelJehoshua Eliashberg
- Topics
- Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (9 papers)Economic and Environmental Valuation (6 papers)Digital Platforms and Economics (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesRussia
In The Last Decade
Charles C. Moul
23 papers receiving 376 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- Economics and Econometrics 230
- Marketing 164
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 91
- Sociology and Political Science 82
- Statistics and Probability 49
Countries citing papers authored by Charles C. Moul
This map shows the geographic impact of Charles C. Moul's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles C. Moul with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles C. Moul more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Charles C. Moul
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles C. Moul. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles C. Moul. The network helps show where Charles C. Moul may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Charles C. Moul
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Charles C. Moul. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Charles C. Moul based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Charles C. Moul. Charles C. Moul is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 19 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 13 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 0 | |
| 14 | 22 | |
| 15 | 55 | |
| 16 | 97 | |
| 17 | 9 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | Consequences of omitting advertising in demand estimation: An application to theatrical movies | 4 |
| 20 | 9 |
About Charles C. Moul
Charles C. Moul is a scholar working on Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management, Marketing and Visual Arts and Performing Arts, having authored 25 papers that have together received 400 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (9 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (6 papers) and Digital Platforms and Economics (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Visual Arts and Performing Arts (91 citations), Marketing (164 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (230 citations). Charles C. Moul has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Mark D. Manuszak, John V. C. Nye, Patrick McAlvanah, Charles B. Weinberg, Janet Wasko, S. Abraham Ravid, Harold L. Vogel, Jehoshua Eliashberg, Xin Chen and Jia Li. Their work appears in journals such as The Review of Economics and Statistics, Marketing Science and Journal of money credit and banking.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.