Chagai Weiss
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Communication top 10%
- Gender Studies
- Strategy and Management
- Co-authors
- Jonathan RenshonJoshua D. KertzerRyan BrutgerDustin TingleyAnna GetmanskyJ. Stefan RokemDan MiodownikKyle Peyton
- Topics
- Social and Intergroup Psychology (7 papers)Electoral Systems and Political Participation (6 papers)Gender Politics and Representation (3 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesAmerican Political Science ReviewAmerican Journal of Political Science
- Partner nations
- United StatesIsraelUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Chagai Weiss
15 papers receiving 262 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Sociology and Political Science 183
- Political Science and International Relations 156
- Communication 39
- Gender Studies 39
- Strategy and Management 16
Countries citing papers authored by Chagai Weiss
This map shows the geographic impact of Chagai Weiss's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chagai Weiss with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chagai Weiss more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Chagai Weiss
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chagai Weiss. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chagai Weiss. The network helps show where Chagai Weiss may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Chagai Weiss
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Chagai Weiss. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Chagai Weiss based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Chagai Weiss. Chagai Weiss is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 12 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | Abstraction and Detail in Experimental Designbreakdown → | 77 |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | 27 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 14 | |
| 12 | 55 | |
| 13 | 26 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | 9 | |
| 16 | 19 |
About Chagai Weiss
Chagai Weiss is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Political Science and International Relations and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 16 papers that have together received 277 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (7 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (6 papers) and Gender Politics and Representation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (156 citations), Communication (39 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (183 citations). Chagai Weiss has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jonathan Renshon, Joshua D. Kertzer, Ryan Brutger, Dustin Tingley, Anna Getmansky, J. Stefan Rokem, Dan Miodownik, Kyle Peyton, Ellen Lust and Saar Alon‐Barkat. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, American Political Science Review and American Journal of Political Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.