Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
mediation:RPackage for Causal Mediation Analysis
20142.6k citationsDustin Tingley, Teppei Yamamoto et al.profile →
A general approach to causal mediation analysis.
20102.5k citationsKosuke Imai, Luke Keele et al.Psychological Methodsprofile →
Structural Topic Models for Open‐Ended Survey Responses
20141.2k citationsBrandon Stewart, Dustin Tingley et al.profile →
Unpacking the Black Box of Causality: Learning about Causal Mechanisms from Experimental and Observational Studies
20111.1k citationsKosuke Imai, Luke Keele et al.American Political Science Reviewprofile →
stm: An R Package for Structural Topic Models
2019861 citationsBrandon Stewart, Dustin Tingley et al.profile →
“Who are these people?” Evaluating the demographic characteristics and political preferences of MTurk survey respondents
Countries citing papers authored by Dustin Tingley
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Dustin Tingley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dustin Tingley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dustin Tingley more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dustin Tingley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dustin Tingley. The network helps show where Dustin Tingley may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dustin Tingley
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dustin Tingley.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dustin Tingley based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Dustin Tingley. Dustin Tingley is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Kim, In Song, Helen V. Milner, Thomas Bernauer, et al.. (2019). Firms’ Preferences over Multidimensional Trade Policies: Global Production Chains, Investment Protection and Dispute Settlement Mechanisms. International Studies Quarterly.4 indexed citations
Tingley, Dustin & Barbara F. Walter. (2011). Reputation Building in International Relations: An Experimental Approach. International Organization. 65.6 indexed citations
16.
Imai, Kosuke, Luke Keele, Dustin Tingley, & Teppei Yamamoto. (2011). Unpacking the Black-Box: Learning about Causal Mechanisms from Experimental and Observational Studies. American Political Science Review. 105(4).28 indexed citations
17.
Tingley, Dustin. (2010). Donors and Domestic Politics: Political Influences on Foreign Aid Commitments. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance. 50.12 indexed citations
18.
Chaudoin, Stephen, Helen V. Milner, & Dustin Tingley. (2010). The Center Still Holds: The Potential for Liberal Internationalism Survives. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
19.
Milner, Helen V. & Dustin Tingley. (2010). The Domestic Politics of Foreign Aid: American Legislators and the Politics of Donor Countries. Economics and Politics. 22(2). 1–53.12 indexed citations
20.
Tingley, Dustin. (2006). Evolving Political Science: Biological Adaptation, Rational Action, and Symbolism in Political Science. Politics and the Life Sciences. 25.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.