Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A Technique for Analysis of Utilization-Availability Data
19741.3k citationsClyde W. Neu, Celina Byers et al.Journal of Wildlife Managementprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Celina Byers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Celina Byers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Celina Byers more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Celina Byers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Celina Byers. The network helps show where Celina Byers may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Celina Byers
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Celina Byers.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Celina Byers based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Celina Byers. Celina Byers is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
15 of 15 papers shown
1.
Byers, Celina & Hugh Μ. Cannon. (2014). THE PROGRAMMING GAME: AN EXPLORATORY COLLABORATION BETWEEN BUSINESS SIMULATION AND INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN. Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning: Proceedings of the Annual ABSEL conference. 34.1 indexed citations
Byers, Celina. (2002). Interactive Assessment and Course Transformation Using Web-Based Tools. 2002(1).2 indexed citations
8.
Byers, Celina. (2001). Interactive Assessment: An Approach to Enhance Teaching and Learning. The Journal of Interactive Learning Research. 12(4). 359–374.23 indexed citations
9.
Stone, Robert W., et al.. (2000). Using Information Systems as a Unifying Influence in an Integrated Business Curriculum. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 11(1). 61–66.2 indexed citations
10.
Morris, John S., et al.. (1998). The Execution and Evaluation of an Integrated Business Common Core Curriculum.. 47(2). 166–182.17 indexed citations
11.
Byers, Celina, et al.. (1996). What to Teach in an Information Systems Curriculum: Depends on Whom You Ask!. The Journal of Information and Systems in Education. 8(2). 40–45.1 indexed citations
Wright, Philip L., et al.. (1985). Measuring and Scoring North American Big Game Trophies.24 indexed citations
15.
Neu, Clyde W., Celina Byers, & James M. Peek. (1974). A Technique for Analysis of Utilization-Availability Data. Journal of Wildlife Management. 38(3). 541–541.1326 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.