Celia Cerrato
About
In The Last Decade
Celia Cerrato
2 papers receiving 812 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Molecular Biology 746
- Cancer Research 616
- Oncology 42
- Genetics 34
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 27
Countries citing papers authored by Celia Cerrato
This map shows the geographic impact of Celia Cerrato's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Celia Cerrato with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Celia Cerrato more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Celia Cerrato
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Celia Cerrato. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Celia Cerrato. The network helps show where Celia Cerrato may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Celia Cerrato
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Celia Cerrato. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Celia Cerrato based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Celia Cerrato. Celia Cerrato is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 95 | |
| 2 | Genetic Unmasking of an Epigenetically Silenced microRNA in Human Cancer Cells breakdown → | 729 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.