Celia Brown

85 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Hit Papers

The stepped wedge trial design: a systematic review 2006 · 654 citations
6542006202620122019200400600

Peers

Celia Brown
Comparison fields: 5 of 151
  • Family Practice 137
  • Emergency Medical Services 348
  • Health Information Management 174
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 135
  • General Health Professions 868
Replace Lloyd Provost with:
Lloyd Provost United States
Marit Johansen Norway
Patrick W. Brady United States
John Hickner United States
David B. Nash United States
Patrick H. Conway United States
Jeff Luck United States
Seth W. Glickman United States
Jennifer Hicks United States
Douglas H. Fernald United States
Celia Brown relative to Lloyd Provost United States Lloyd Provost's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Lloyd Provost · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Celia Brown

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Celia Brown's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Celia Brown with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Celia Brown more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Celia Brown

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Celia Brown. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Celia Brown. The network helps show where Celia Brown may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Celia Brown, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Celia Brown Line = papers co-authored together Celia Brown links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 89 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
The stepped wedge trial design: a systematic review
Hit paper breakdown →
2006654
2 2011302
3 2007153
4 2008144
5 200298
6 200887
7 200884
8 200861
9 200847
10 201747
11 200845
12 201744
13 201742
14 201941
15 201040
16 201829
17 201827
18 201726
19 201621
20 201120

About Celia Brown

Celia Brown is a scholar working on Family Practice, Emergency Medical Services, Health Information Management, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 89 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (32 papers), Medical Education and Admissions (21 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (13 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (13 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (12 papers), Diversity and Career in Medicine (10 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (9 papers) and Global Health Workforce Issues (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (137 citations), Emergency Medical Services (348 citations), Health Information Management (174 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (135 citations) and General Health Professions (868 citations). Celia Brown has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Richard Lilford, Mei‐See Man, David Torgerson, Noreen Dadirai Mdege, Jon Nicholl, Timothy P. Hofer, Richard Thomson, Amanpreet Johal, Bryony Dean Franklin and J P Nicholl. Their work appears in journals such as Medical Teacher, BMJ Open, BMC Medical Education, Human Resources for Health and BMC Health Services Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026