Ben Schmand

7 papers receiving 608 citations

Peers

Ben Schmand
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 458
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 32
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 52
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 101
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 143
Replace Corina Pohl with:
Corina Pohl Germany
Jeffrey A. Cordes United States
Jeannette Bischkopf Germany
Devangere Devanand United States
Cláudia Sellitto Porto Brazil
Louise M. Reid United Kingdom
L F Pascual Spain
Cristina Lojo‐Seoane Spain
Yasuyoshi Sekita Japan
Anna Stigsdotter‐Neely Sweden
Ben Schmand relative to Corina Pohl Germany Corina Pohl's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Corina Pohl · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ben Schmand

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ben Schmand's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ben Schmand with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ben Schmand more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ben Schmand

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ben Schmand. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ben Schmand. The network helps show where Ben Schmand may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Ben Schmand, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ben Schmand Line = papers co-authored together Ben Schmand links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
#Work
1 1996288
2 1998120
3 199796
4 199859
5 199942
6 201912
7
[Validity of the cognitive screening tests and the mini-mental status examination in a group of elderly hospital patients].
19917

About Ben Schmand

Ben Schmand is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Physiology, Surgery and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, having authored 7 papers that have together received 624 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (6 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (2 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (1 paper), Nutritional Studies and Diet (1 paper), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (1 paper), Aging and Gerontology Research (1 paper), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (1 paper) and Medical and Biological Sciences (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (458 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (32 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (52 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (101 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (143 citations). Ben Schmand has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include J. Lindeboom, Cees Jonker, Chris Hooijer, Louis M. Havekes, Lenore J. Launer, Mirjam I. Geerlings, Johannes H. Smit, Carolien Smits, Betto G. Deelman and W. van Tilburg. Their work appears in journals such as Neurology, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Psychological Medicine, Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology and Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact