Cecilia Cederfur

595 total citations
7 papers, 474 citations indexed

About

Cecilia Cederfur is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Immunology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Cecilia Cederfur has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 474 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Molecular Biology, 5 papers in Immunology and 2 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Cecilia Cederfur's work include Galectins and Cancer Biology (5 papers), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (4 papers) and Nerve injury and regeneration (2 papers). Cecilia Cederfur is often cited by papers focused on Galectins and Cancer Biology (5 papers), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (4 papers) and Nerve injury and regeneration (2 papers). Cecilia Cederfur collaborates with scholars based in Sweden, Australia and France. Cecilia Cederfur's co-authors include Hakon Leffler, Jost Enninga, Nicolas Dupont, Marie‐Christine Prévost, Françoise Poirier, Joëlle Mounier, Philippe Sansonetti, Martin Sachse, Frank Lafont and Emma Salomonsson and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Neurochemistry and Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects.

In The Last Decade

Cecilia Cederfur

7 papers receiving 470 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Cecilia Cederfur Sweden	6	211	183	132	61	54	7	474
Yuri V. Kim United States	10	148 0.7×	75 0.4×	149 1.1×	26 0.4×	19 0.4×	12	590
Barbara Peracino Italy	13	277 1.3×	98 0.5×	49 0.4×	148 2.4×	253 4.7×	24	679
Yuhong Zhou United States	10	442 2.1×	194 1.1×	41 0.3×	22 0.4×	29 0.5×	14	766
Stefan Pils Germany	7	155 0.7×	131 0.7×	34 0.3×	31 0.5×	23 0.4×	7	523
Julie Mazzolini France	13	186 0.9×	270 1.5×	51 0.4×	11 0.2×	131 2.4×	20	600
Agnieszka Mamińska United States	7	238 1.1×	232 1.3×	69 0.5×	14 0.2×	77 1.4×	7	507
Floriane Herit France	9	136 0.6×	171 0.9×	59 0.4×	10 0.2×	121 2.2×	13	418
Ralf M. Leonhardt United States	17	387 1.8×	303 1.7×	105 0.8×	9 0.1×	193 3.6×	24	710
Laura Cogli Italy	10	259 1.2×	66 0.4×	112 0.8×	35 0.6×	289 5.4×	10	591
Søren Høgh Netherlands	2	157 0.7×	58 0.3×	150 1.1×	11 0.2×	71 1.3×	2	332

Countries citing papers authored by Cecilia Cederfur

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cecilia Cederfur's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cecilia Cederfur with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cecilia Cederfur more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cecilia Cederfur

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cecilia Cederfur. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cecilia Cederfur. The network helps show where Cecilia Cederfur may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cecilia Cederfur

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cecilia Cederfur. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cecilia Cederfur based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cecilia Cederfur. Cecilia Cederfur is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

1.

Lau, Chew L., Ross D. O’Shea, Cecilia Cederfur, et al.. (2017). Galactose-functionalised PCL nanofibre scaffolds to attenuate inflammatory action of astrocytes in vitro and in vivo. Journal of Materials Chemistry B. 5(22). 4073–4083. 15 indexed citations

2.

Lau, Chew L., John S. Forsythe, Holly S. Cate, et al.. (2014). 3D Electrospun scaffolds promote a cytotrophic phenotype of cultured primary astrocytes. Journal of Neurochemistry. 130(2). 215–226. 49 indexed citations

3.

Cederfur, Cecilia, Johan Malmström, Kristian Nihlberg, et al.. (2012). Glycoproteomic identification of galectin-3 and -8 ligands in bronchoalveolar lavage of mild asthmatics and healthy subjects. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects. 1820(9). 1429–1436. 19 indexed citations

4.

Carlsson, Michael C., Cecilia Cederfur, Viveka Schaar, et al.. (2011). Galectin-1-Binding Glycoforms of Haptoglobin with Altered Intracellular Trafficking, and Increase in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients. PLoS ONE. 6(10). e26560–e26560. 38 indexed citations

5.

Sachse, Martin, Nicolas Dupont, Cecilia Cederfur, et al.. (2010). Galectin-3, a marker for vacuole lysis by invasive pathogens. Cellular Microbiology. 3 indexed citations

6.

Sachse, Martin, Nicolas Dupont, Joëlle Mounier, et al.. (2009). Galectin-3, a marker for vacuole lysis by invasive pathogens. Cellular Microbiology. 12(4). 530–544. 297 indexed citations

7.

Cederfur, Cecilia, Emma Salomonsson, Jonas Nilsson, et al.. (2008). Different affinity of galectins for human serum glycoproteins: Galectin-3 binds many protease inhibitors and acute phase proteins. Glycobiology. 18(5). 384–394. 53 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact