Cécile R. L. Boot
- General Health Professions top 0.5%
- Pharmacology top 1%
- Demography top 0.5%
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Allard J. van der BeekJohannes R. AnemaPaulien M. BongersPieter CoenenKarin I. ProperJaap H. van DieënIdsart KingmaWillem van Mechelen
- Topics
- Workplace Health and Well-being (114 papers)Employment and Welfare Studies (43 papers)Retirement, Disability, and Employment (33 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Cécile R. L. Boot
174 papers receiving 3.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 149
- General Health Professions 1.9k
- Pharmacology 605
- Demography 597
- Social Psychology 557
- Clinical Psychology 346
Countries citing papers authored by Cécile R. L. Boot
This map shows the geographic impact of Cécile R. L. Boot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cécile R. L. Boot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cécile R. L. Boot more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Cécile R. L. Boot
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cécile R. L. Boot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cécile R. L. Boot. The network helps show where Cécile R. L. Boot may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cécile R. L. Boot
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cécile R. L. Boot. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cécile R. L. Boot based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cécile R. L. Boot. Cécile R. L. Boot is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 25 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 11 | |
| 10 | 35 | |
| 11 | 23 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 8 | |
| 14 | 81 | |
| 15 | 48 | |
| 16 | 13 | |
| 17 | 22 | |
| 18 | 20 | |
| 19 | 4 | |
| 20 | Effectiviteit PAGO's beter onderzoeken. | 0 |
About Cécile R. L. Boot
Cécile R. L. Boot is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology and Demography, having authored 182 papers that have together received 3.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Workplace Health and Well-being (114 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (43 papers) and Retirement, Disability, and Employment (33 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (1.9k citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (338 citations) and Research and Theory (54 citations). Cécile R. L. Boot has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Allard J. van der Beek, Johannes R. Anema, Paulien M. Bongers, Pieter Coenen, Karin I. Proper, Jaap H. van Dieën, Idsart Kingma, Willem van Mechelen, M. van Vilsteren and Jos W. R. Twisk. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, The Journal of Physiology and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.