Catherine Zuckert
- Philosophy top 2%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- History top 5%
- Anthropology
- Co-authors
- Michael P. ZuckertLéo StraussJeffrey ChurchPeter Augustine LawlerWaldemar GurianDaniel J. LangArend LijphartC. Leland Ellison
- Topics
- Classical Philosophy and Thought (7 papers)Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (6 papers)Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesPortugal
In The Last Decade
Catherine Zuckert
40 papers receiving 175 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
- Philosophy 111
- Political Science and International Relations 103
- Sociology and Political Science 86
- History 35
- Anthropology 22
Countries citing papers authored by Catherine Zuckert
This map shows the geographic impact of Catherine Zuckert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Catherine Zuckert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Catherine Zuckert more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Catherine Zuckert
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Catherine Zuckert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Catherine Zuckert. The network helps show where Catherine Zuckert may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Catherine Zuckert
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Catherine Zuckert. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Catherine Zuckert based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Catherine Zuckert. Catherine Zuckert is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | Aristotelian Virtue Ethics and Modern Liberal Democracy | 3 |
| 4 | Machiavelli's democratic republic | 3 |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | Do “Virtue Ethics” Require “Virtue Politics”? | 0 |
| 7 | Magnanimity and Statesmanship | 11 |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | The Socratic Turn | 5 |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | Who’s a Philosopher? Who’s a Sophist? The Stranger V. Socrates | 4 |
| 13 | Plato's 'Parmenides': A Dramatic Reading | 1 |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | Aristotle on the Limits and Satisfactions of Political Life | 15 |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 16 |
About Catherine Zuckert
Catherine Zuckert is a scholar working on Philosophy, General Psychology and History, having authored 51 papers that have together received 245 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Philosophy and Thought (7 papers), Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (6 papers) and Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (111 citations), Political Science and International Relations (103 citations) and History (35 citations). Catherine Zuckert has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include Michael P. Zuckert, Léo Strauss, Jeffrey Church, Peter Augustine Lawler, Waldemar Gurian, Daniel J. Lang, Arend Lijphart, C. Leland Ellison, Max Weber and M Fitzsimons. Their work appears in journals such as American Political Science Review, The Journal of Politics and Political Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.