Arvind-Pal Singh Mandair
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Philosophy top 5%
- Anthropology top 10%
- Religious studies top 5%
- Co-authors
- Markus DreßlerChristopher ShackleGurharpal SinghAnne MurphyGreg JohnsonChristopher M. RogersGail M. PresbeyGeorgina Stewart
- Topics
- South Asian Studies and Diaspora (10 papers)Indian History and Philosophy (6 papers)South Asian Studies and Conflicts (5 papers)
- Journals
- New England Journal of MedicineReligionComparative Studies of South Asia Africa and the Middle East
- Partner nations
- United StatesIndiaCanada
In The Last Decade
Arvind-Pal Singh Mandair
12 papers receiving 192 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
- Sociology and Political Science 142
- Political Science and International Relations 116
- Philosophy 90
- Anthropology 51
- Religious studies 18
Countries citing papers authored by Arvind-Pal Singh Mandair
This map shows the geographic impact of Arvind-Pal Singh Mandair's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Arvind-Pal Singh Mandair with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Arvind-Pal Singh Mandair more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Arvind-Pal Singh Mandair
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Arvind-Pal Singh Mandair. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Arvind-Pal Singh Mandair. The network helps show where Arvind-Pal Singh Mandair may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Arvind-Pal Singh Mandair
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Arvind-Pal Singh Mandair. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Arvind-Pal Singh Mandair based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Arvind-Pal Singh Mandair. Arvind-Pal Singh Mandair is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | 0 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | Introduction: Modernity, Religion-Making, and the Postsecular | 15 |
| 15 | Secularism and Religion-Making | 112 |
| 16 | 91 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 1 |
About Arvind-Pal Singh Mandair
Arvind-Pal Singh Mandair is a scholar working on Philosophy, Religious studies and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 18 papers that have together received 237 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include South Asian Studies and Diaspora (10 papers), Indian History and Philosophy (6 papers) and South Asian Studies and Conflicts (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (90 citations), Anthropology (51 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (116 citations). Arvind-Pal Singh Mandair has collaborated with scholars based in United States, India and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Markus Dreßler, Christopher Shackle, Gurharpal Singh, Anne Murphy, Greg Johnson, Christopher M. Rogers, Gail M. Presbey, Georgina Stewart, Ananya Jahanara Kabir and Stephen Harris. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Religion and Comparative Studies of South Asia Africa and the Middle East.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.