Catherine Smith
- Small Animals top 10%
- Food Science
- Epidemiology
- Literature and Literary Theory top 10%
- Language and Linguistics top 10%
- Co-authors
- Michaela MahlbergKrishna K. GopaulAdrian M. WhatmoreMark S. KoylassPeter StockwellMatthew Brook O’DonnellJohan de JoodeSvenja Adolphs
- Topics
- Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (4 papers)Translation Studies and Practices (3 papers)Natural Language Processing Techniques (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Catherine Smith
13 papers receiving 142 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Small Animals 55
- Food Science 39
- Epidemiology 35
- Literature and Literary Theory 34
- Language and Linguistics 33
Countries citing papers authored by Catherine Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Catherine Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Catherine Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Catherine Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Catherine Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Catherine Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Catherine Smith. The network helps show where Catherine Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Catherine Smith
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Catherine Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Catherine Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Catherine Smith. Catherine Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 23 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | The Workspace for Collaborative Editing | 2 |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 12 | |
| 10 | 30 | |
| 11 | 64 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | NUMBER OF TREES PER EXPERIMENTAL UNIT IS IMPORTANT WHEN COMPARING TRANSPLANT STRESS INDEX VALUES | 1 |
| 14 | Combined analysis of data on chromosome 7q from three autism genome scans | 1 |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 5 |
About Catherine Smith
Catherine Smith is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Human-Computer Interaction and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 164 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (4 papers), Translation Studies and Practices (3 papers) and Natural Language Processing Techniques (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Small Animals (55 citations), Language and Linguistics (33 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (34 citations). Catherine Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Michaela Mahlberg, Krishna K. Gopaul, Adrian M. Whatmore, Mark S. Koylass, Peter Stockwell, Matthew Brook O’Donnell, Johan de Joode, Svenja Adolphs, Simon Preston and David F. Moffett. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Membrane Biology, BMC Microbiology and International Journal of Corpus Linguistics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.