Edwin Cedamon
- Forestry top 5%
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management 19
- Forest Management and Policy 16
-
- Agricultural Innovations and Practices 3
- Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development 3
- Rural development and sustainability 3
-
- Agriculture and Rural Development Research 3
-
- Economic and Environmental Valuation 2
-
- Forest ecology and management 2
Edwin Cedamon
39 papers receiving 322 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Forestry 52
- Global and Planetary Change 188
- Horticulture 7
- General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 55
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 56
Countries citing papers authored by Edwin Cedamon
This map shows the geographic impact of Edwin Cedamon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edwin Cedamon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edwin Cedamon more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Edwin Cedamon
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edwin Cedamon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edwin Cedamon. The network helps show where Edwin Cedamon may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Edwin Cedamon, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 5 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 6 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 7 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 9 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 13 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 5 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 15 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 81 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 15 | |
| 14 | 2012 | 8 | |
| 15 | 2007 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2007 | 2 | |
| 17 | Present Tree Planting and Management Activities in Four Rural Communities in Leyte Province, the Philippines | 2005 | 4 |
| 18 | 2005 | 3 | |
| 19 | Nursery management in relation to root deformation, sowing and shading | 2005 | 10 |
| 20 | Fine-tuning the Leyte tree farm research project: Lessons from a planning workshop | 2005 | 2 |
About Edwin Cedamon
Edwin Cedamon is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Business and International Management, having authored 42 papers that have together received 352 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (19 papers), Forest Management and Policy (16 papers), Agricultural Innovations and Practices (3 papers), Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development (3 papers), Agriculture and Rural Development Research (3 papers), Rural development and sustainability (3 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (2 papers) and Forest ecology and management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Forestry (52 citations), Global and Planetary Change (188 citations) and Horticulture (7 citations). Edwin Cedamon has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Philippines and Nepal. Frequent co-authors include Ian Nuberg, Krishna K. Shrestha, Bishnu Hari Pandit, Naya Sharma Paudel, Hemant Ojha, John Herbohn, Krishna P. Paudel, Y.B. Malla, Phil McManus and Jonathan Rigg. Their work appears in journals such as Small-scale Forestry, Journal of Rural Studies, Australian Forestry, Forest Policy and Economics and Agroforestry Systems.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.