Sarah E. McVay
- Accounting top 0.1%
- Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance 58
- Corporate Finance and Governance 34
- Corporate Taxation and Avoidance 6
- Accounting Theory and Financial Reporting 4
- Strategy and Management top 0.2%
- Financial Reporting and Valuation Research 33
- Finance top 0.5%
- Financial Markets and Investment Strategies 17
-
- Accounting and Organizational Management 3
- Supply Chain and Inventory Management 2
- Economics and Econometrics top 1%
Sarah E. McVay
59 papers receiving 6.4k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Accounting 5.9k
- Strategy and Management 2.7k
- Finance 1.7k
- Management Information Systems 665
- Economics and Econometrics 919
Countries citing papers authored by Sarah E. McVay
This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah E. McVay's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah E. McVay with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah E. McVay more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah E. McVay
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah E. McVay. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah E. McVay. The network helps show where Sarah E. McVay may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sarah E. McVay, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 6 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 4 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 2 | |
| 8 | Internal Control over Financial Reporting and Resource Extraction: Evidence from China | 2020 | 1 |
| 9 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 27 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 11 | |
| 12 | Qualifying Special Items: An Identification and Examination of Lower-Quality versus Higher-Quality Income-Decreasing Special Items | 2016 | 4 |
| 13 | 2013 | 22 | |
| 14 | Quantifying Managerial Ability: A New Measure and Validity Testsbreakdown → | 2012 | 1285 |
| 15 | 2010 | 6 | |
| 16 | 2007 | 126 | |
| 17 | Trading Incentives to Meet the Analyst Forecast | 2006 | 18 |
| 18 | 2006 | 148 | |
| 19 | The Disclosure of Material Weaknesses in Internal Control after the Sarbanes-Oxley Act | 2005 | 30 |
| 20 | 2004 | 2 |
About Sarah E. McVay
Sarah E. McVay is a scholar working on Accounting, Strategy and Management and Finance, having authored 63 papers that have together received 6.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (58 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (34 papers), Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (33 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (17 papers), Corporate Taxation and Avoidance (6 papers), Accounting Theory and Financial Reporting (4 papers), Accounting and Organizational Management (3 papers) and Supply Chain and Inventory Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Accounting (5.9k citations), Strategy and Management (2.7k citations) and Finance (1.7k citations). Sarah E. McVay has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Latvia. Frequent co-authors include Weili Ge, Peter R. Demerjian, Baruch Lev, Jeffrey T. Doyle, Mei Feng, Chan Li, Asher Curtis, Melissa F. Lewis‐Western, Richard M. Frankel and Hollis Ashbaugh Skaife. Their work appears in journals such as The Accounting Review, Accounting Horizons, Review of Accounting Studies, Contemporary Accounting Research and Journal of Accounting and Economics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.