Philip Walker
Impact in
- Family Practice top 2%
- Medication Adherence and Compliance
-
- Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Papers in
-
- Health Sciences Research and Education 3
- Health Policy Implementation Science 2
- Co-authors
- Lizheng Shi (1 shared paper)Vivian Fonseca (1 shared paper)Jinan Liu (1 shared paper)Manjiri Pawaskar (1 shared paper)Anupama Kalsekar (1 shared paper)Mary S. Dietrich (1 shared paper)Stephen Bruehl (1 shared paper)Sarah S. Osmundson (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Medical Reference Services Quarterly (2 papers)Health and Quality of Life Outcomes (1 paper)iScience (1 paper)Systematic Reviews (1 paper)Learning Health Systems (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
Philip Walker
13 papers receiving 205 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Family Practice 69
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 17
- Library and Information Sciences 4
- Psychiatry and Mental health 20
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 33
Countries citing papers authored by Philip Walker
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Walker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Walker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Walker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Walker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Walker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Walker. The network helps show where Philip Walker may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip Walker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 | 143 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 35 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 14 | |
| 4 | 2009 | 6 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 7 | Making What Matters Count | 2015 | 1 |
| 8 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2009 | 1 |
About Philip Walker
Philip Walker is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Molecular Biology, Genetics, Health and Family Practice, having authored 13 papers that have together received 212 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Sciences Research and Education (3 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers), Genomics and Rare Diseases (1 paper), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (1 paper), Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (1 paper), Entomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control (1 paper), Misinformation and Its Impacts (1 paper) and Web and Library Services (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (69 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (17 citations), Library and Information Sciences (4 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (20 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (33 citations). Philip Walker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Lizheng Shi, Vivian Fonseca, Jinan Liu, Manjiri Pawaskar, Anupama Kalsekar, Mary S. Dietrich, Stephen Bruehl, Sarah S. Osmundson, Amanda Stone and Matthew C. Morris. Their work appears in journals such as Medical Reference Services Quarterly, Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, iScience, Systematic Reviews and Learning Health Systems.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.