Connie Delaney

594 total citations
30 papers, 399 citations indexed

About

Connie Delaney is a scholar working on Issues, ethics and legal aspects, General Health Professions and Health Information Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Connie Delaney has authored 30 papers receiving a total of 399 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Issues, ethics and legal aspects, 12 papers in General Health Professions and 12 papers in Health Information Management. Recurrent topics in Connie Delaney's work include Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (17 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (12 papers) and Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (4 papers). Connie Delaney is often cited by papers focused on Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (17 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (12 papers) and Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (4 papers). Connie Delaney collaborates with scholars based in United States, Portugal and Italy. Connie Delaney's co-authors include Sue Moorhead, Meridean Maas, Bonnie L. Westra, Mikyoung Lee, Judith J. Warren, Barbara F. Brandt, Frank B. Cerra, M. Nawal Lutfiyya, Connie W Delaney and Diane L. Huber and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Medical Care and Journal of Advanced Nursing.

In The Last Decade

Connie Delaney

27 papers receiving 360 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Connie Delaney United States	14	208	205	147	87	38	30	399
Virginia K. Saba United States	14	264 1.3×	159 0.8×	223 1.5×	88 1.0×	34 0.9×	47	471
Heimar F. Marin Brazil	9	99 0.5×	118 0.6×	143 1.0×	80 0.9×	64 1.7×	35	328
Judith Graves United States	9	158 0.8×	157 0.8×	138 0.9×	40 0.5×	23 0.6×	17	291
Cindy A. Scherb United States	11	154 0.7×	170 0.8×	77 0.5×	32 0.4×	44 1.2×	28	328
Ronald Eichstädter Germany	7	176 0.8×	131 0.6×	259 1.8×	57 0.7×	19 0.5×	10	382
Judy Murphy United States	11	46 0.2×	226 1.1×	175 1.2×	106 1.2×	6 0.2×	46	448
Jane M. Brokel United States	11	57 0.3×	83 0.4×	161 1.1×	50 0.6×	5 0.1×	26	296
Daniela Couto Carvalho Barra Brazil	11	118 0.6×	180 0.9×	72 0.5×	55 0.6×	133 3.5×	42	409
Mari Tietze United States	10	30 0.1×	98 0.5×	73 0.5×	68 0.8×	42 1.1×	33	296
Heather Carter‐Templeton United States	11	59 0.3×	134 0.7×	37 0.3×	67 0.8×	28 0.7×	58	389

Countries citing papers authored by Connie Delaney

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Connie Delaney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Connie Delaney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Connie Delaney more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Connie Delaney

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Connie Delaney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Connie Delaney. The network helps show where Connie Delaney may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Connie Delaney

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Connie Delaney. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Connie Delaney based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Connie Delaney. Connie Delaney is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Disch, Joanne & Connie Delaney. (2025). Reflection on Marie Manthey. AJN American Journal of Nursing. 125(4). 11–11. 1 indexed citations

Will, Kristen K., et al.. (2024). Measuring the Impact of Primary Care Team Composition on Patient Activation Utilizing Electronic Health Record Big Data Analytics. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 11(1). 18–28.

Ivory, Catherine H., Barbara A. Caspers, Karen Dunn Lopez, et al.. (2024). Operationalizing Nursing Value. 42(1). 39–39.

Caspers, Barbara A., et al.. (2015). Sharable and Comparable Data for Nursing Management. Nursing Administration Quarterly. 39(4). 297–303. 3 indexed citations

Delaney, Connie, Craig Kuziemsky, & Barbara F. Brandt. (2013). Themed Issue: Interprofessional Practice, Education and Informatics. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 27(4). 351–352. 1 indexed citations

Pereira, Filipe, et al.. (2010). Towards a Uniform Nursing Minimum Data Set in Portugal. 14(2). 1–19.

Lee, Mikyoung, Connie Delaney, & Sue Moorhead. (2007). Building a personal health record from a nursing perspective. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 76. S308–S316. 32 indexed citations

McCormick, Kathleen, Connie Delaney, P. F. Brennan, et al.. (2006). Guideposts to the Future--An Agenda for Nursing Informatics. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 14(1). 19–24. 16 indexed citations

Weaver, Charlotte A., Judith J. Warren, & Connie Delaney. (2005). Bedside, classroom and bench: Collaborative strategies to generate evidence-based knowledge for nursing practice. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 74(11-12). 989–999. 22 indexed citations

10.

Maas, Meridean & Connie Delaney. (2004). Nursing Process Outcome Linkage Research. Medical Care. 42(2). II–40. 27 indexed citations

11.

Delaney, Connie, et al.. (2004). Translation and validation of the Nursing Outcomes Classification labels and definitions for acute care nursing in Iceland. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 46(3). 292–302. 11 indexed citations

12.

Marin, Heimar F., et al.. (2001). Building standard-based nursing information systems. 23 indexed citations

13.

Delaney, Connie, David Reed, & Mary Clarke. (2000). Describing patient problems & nursing treatment patterns using nursing minimum data sets (NMDS & NMMDS) & UHDDS repositories.. PubMed. 176–9. 8 indexed citations

14.

Marek, Karen Dorman, et al.. (1998). ANA standards for nursing data sets in information systems.. PubMed. 16(3). 157–61. 9 indexed citations

15.

Moorhead, Sue & Connie Delaney. (1997). Mapping Nursing Intervention Data Into the Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC): Process and Rules. International Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classifications. 8(4). 137–144. 37 indexed citations

16.

Delaney, Connie, et al.. (1997). Nursing Management Minimum Data Set (NMMDS). JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration. 27(4). 42–48. 44 indexed citations

17.

Huber, Diane L. & Connie Delaney. (1997). The nursing management minimum data set. Applied Nursing Research. 10(3). 164–165. 14 indexed citations

18.

Delaney, Connie. (1996). Use of nursing informatics in advanced nursing practice roles for building healthier populations.. PubMed. 1(4). 48–53. 1 indexed citations

19.

Delaney, Connie & Sue Moorhead. (1995). The Nursing Minimum Data Set, standarized language, and health care quality. Journal of Nursing Care Quality. 10(1). 16–30. 18 indexed citations

20.

Delaney, Connie, et al.. (1991). Validation of defining characteristics of four nursing diagnoses using a computerized data base. Journal of Professional Nursing. 7(5). 293–299. 12 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact