Catherine G. Penney
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 2%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 2%
- Artificial Intelligence top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Topics
- Memory Processes and Influences (13 papers)Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (10 papers)Reading and Literacy Development (8 papers)
- Cited by
- Experimental and Cognitive PsychologyDevelopmental and Educational PsychologyCognitive Neuroscience
- Journals
- Psychological BulletinJournal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and CognitionMemory & Cognition
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Catherine G. Penney
29 papers receiving 822 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
- Cognitive Neuroscience 504
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 490
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 379
- Artificial Intelligence 140
- Social Psychology 119
Countries citing papers authored by Catherine G. Penney
This map shows the geographic impact of Catherine G. Penney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Catherine G. Penney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Catherine G. Penney more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Catherine G. Penney
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Catherine G. Penney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Catherine G. Penney. The network helps show where Catherine G. Penney may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Catherine G. Penney
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Catherine G. Penney. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Catherine G. Penney based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Catherine G. Penney. Catherine G. Penney is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 26 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 491 | |
| 10 | 12 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 27 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 20 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 7 | |
| 19 | 13 | |
| 20 | 10 |
About Catherine G. Penney
Catherine G. Penney is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 30 papers that have together received 950 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Memory Processes and Influences (13 papers), Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (10 papers) and Reading and Literacy Development (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (490 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (379 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (504 citations). Catherine G. Penney has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Bennet B. Murdock, James R. Drover and Brenda Miller Power. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Bulletin, Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition and Memory & Cognition.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.