Catherine E. Garner

692 total citations
7 papers, 579 citations indexed

About

Catherine E. Garner is a scholar working on Food Science, Biomedical Engineering and Biotechnology. According to data from OpenAlex, Catherine E. Garner has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 579 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Food Science, 3 papers in Biomedical Engineering and 2 papers in Biotechnology. Recurrent topics in Catherine E. Garner's work include Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology (3 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (3 papers) and Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety (2 papers). Catherine E. Garner is often cited by papers focused on Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology (3 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (3 papers) and Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety (2 papers). Catherine E. Garner collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and Bangladesh. Catherine E. Garner's co-authors include Ben de Lacy Costello, Stephen J. Smith, Chris Probert, Paul White, R.C. Spencer, Norman M. Ratcliffe, C Probert, Andrew K Ewer, Stella Smith and Pradip Kumar Bardhan and has published in prestigious journals such as The FASEB Journal, Measurement Science and Technology and Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.

In The Last Decade

Catherine E. Garner

7 papers receiving 564 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Catherine E. Garner United Kingdom	6	337	252	164	97	93	7	579
Oluwasola Lawal Netherlands	8	349 1.0×	117 0.5×	35 0.2×	97 1.0×	51 0.5×	9	491
Helmut Wiesenhofer Austria	10	585 1.7×	168 0.7×	79 0.5×	145 1.5×	147 1.6×	12	735
Jennifer M. Scotter New Zealand	10	269 0.8×	85 0.3×	28 0.2×	91 0.9×	46 0.5×	13	422
Dawn P. Fowler United Kingdom	7	98 0.3×	156 0.6×	55 0.3×	22 0.2×	30 0.3×	10	332
Nancy J. Hayward Australia	9	67 0.2×	97 0.4×	39 0.2×	28 0.3×	19 0.2×	16	339
F. Gagliardi Italy	4	40 0.1×	202 0.8×	177 1.1×	15 0.2×	8 0.1×	4	624
Mehmet Hakan Özdener United States	15	228 0.7×	139 0.6×	307 1.9×	17 0.2×	256 2.8×	25	1.0k
Jenni Lappi Finland	14	53 0.2×	320 1.3×	385 2.3×	16 0.2×	9 0.1×	26	925
D. A. Cramer United States	10	100 0.3×	103 0.4×	88 0.5×	23 0.2×	13 0.1×	25	584
Laëtitia Théron France	14	41 0.1×	249 1.0×	35 0.2×	37 0.4×	4 0.0×	39	576

Countries citing papers authored by Catherine E. Garner

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Catherine E. Garner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Catherine E. Garner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Catherine E. Garner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Catherine E. Garner

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Catherine E. Garner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Catherine E. Garner. The network helps show where Catherine E. Garner may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Catherine E. Garner

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Catherine E. Garner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Catherine E. Garner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Catherine E. Garner. Catherine E. Garner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

Ewen, Richard J., et al.. (2014). Towards point of care testing forC. difficileinfection by volatile profiling, using the combination of a short multi-capillary gas chromatography column with metal oxide sensor detection. Measurement Science and Technology. 25(6). 65108–65108. 27 indexed citations

Garner, Catherine E., Stella Smith, Pradip Kumar Bardhan, Norman M. Ratcliffe, & C Probert. (2009). A pilot study of faecal volatile organic compounds in faeces from cholera patients in Bangladesh to determine their utility in disease diagnosis. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 103(11). 1171–1173. 61 indexed citations

Garner, Catherine E., Andrew K Ewer, Rosemary Greenwood, et al.. (2009). Analysis of Faecal Volatile Organic Compounds in Preterm Infants Who Develop Necrotising Enterocolitis: A Pilot Study. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition. 49(5). 559–565. 71 indexed citations

Costello, Ben de Lacy, Richard J. Ewen, Andrew K Ewer, et al.. (2008). An analysis of volatiles in the headspace of the faeces of neonates. Journal of Breath Research. 2(3). 37023–37023. 43 indexed citations

Garner, Catherine E., Stephen J. Smith, Nicola Elviss, et al.. (2008). Identification ofCampylobacterinfection in chickens from volatile faecal emissions. Biomarkers. 13(4). 413–421. 19 indexed citations

Garner, Catherine E., Stephen J. Smith, Ben de Lacy Costello, et al.. (2007). Volatile organic compounds from feces and their potential for diagnosis of gastrointestinal disease. The FASEB Journal. 21(8). 1675–1688. 357 indexed citations

Ewen, Richard J., et al.. (2005). RAPID DIAGNOSIS OF GASTRO-INTESTINAL INFECTION USING FAECAL ODOUR. 429–436. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact