Catherine Bryan

13 papers receiving 116 citations

Peers

Catherine Bryan
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
  • Public Administration 11
  • Clinical Psychology 48
  • Sociology and Political Science 81
  • General Health Professions 31
  • Development 3
Replace Eric van Santen with:
Eric van Santen Germany
Enrica Rigo Italy
Elisabeth Backe‐Hansen Norway
Asgeir Falch‐Eriksen Estonia
Nina Rother Germany
Sarah Zlotnik United States
Julia Sloth–Nielsen South Africa
Rachel E. Luft United States
Alex Sager United States
Jana Schäfer Germany
Catherine Bryan relative to Eric van Santen Germany Eric van Santen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Eric van Santen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Catherine Bryan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Catherine Bryan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Catherine Bryan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Catherine Bryan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Catherine Bryan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Catherine Bryan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Catherine Bryan. The network helps show where Catherine Bryan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Catherine Bryan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Catherine Bryan Line = papers co-authored together Catherine Bryan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 201130
2 201221
3 202214
4 201413
5 201212
6 201711
7 20228
8 20196
9 20214
10 20212
11 20251
12 20191
13
Ambivalent Transnationalism: Class, Gender, and Nova Scotia Nominees
20111
14
Antropofagia and Beyond: Patrícia Galvão¿s Industrial Park in the Age of Savage Capitalism
20070
15 20180
16
Nostalgia, Resistance and the Mestiza Migrant Subject in J. M. Gorriti's Si haces mal no esperes bien and C. Matto de Turner's Aves sin nido and Herencia1
20040

About Catherine Bryan

Catherine Bryan is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Demography and Education, having authored 16 papers that have together received 124 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy (6 papers), Migration and Labor Dynamics (5 papers), Migration, Refugees, and Integration (4 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (3 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (3 papers), Education and experiences of immigrants and refugees (3 papers), Diaspora, migration, transnational identity (2 papers) and Psychological Testing and Assessment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (11 citations), Clinical Psychology (48 citations), Sociology and Political Science (81 citations), General Health Professions (31 citations) and Development (3 citations). Catherine Bryan has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Myriam Denov, Pauline Gardiner Barber, Haorui Wu, Bruce D. Clarkson, Elizabeth Fitting, Karen Polinger Foster and Sarah Withers. Their work appears in journals such as Dialectical Anthropology, International Migration, Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development and Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact