Dialectical Anthropology

945 papers and 5.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 945 papers published in Dialectical Anthropology in the last decades have received a total of 5.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Dialectical Anthropology usually cover Sociology and Political Science (395 papers), Political Science and International Relations (174 papers) and Anthropology (110 papers) specifically the topics of Anthropological Studies and Insights (61 papers), Political Economy and Marxism (54 papers) and Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy (39 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Dialectical Anthropology are Stuart Kirsch, Orlando Fals Borda, R. L. HOLLOWAY, Jean E. Jackson, Sidney W. Mintz, Loïc Wacquant, Kevin Dwyer, Theodoros Rakopoulos, Vincent Crapanzano and Stef Jansen.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Dialectical Anthropology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Dialectical Anthropology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Dialectical Anthropology.

Countries where authors publish in Dialectical Anthropology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Dialectical Anthropology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Dialectical Anthropology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dialectical Anthropology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025