Catherine Best
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 2%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 5%
- Linguistics and Language top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Artificial Intelligence top 10%
- Co-authors
- Gerald W. McRobertsOsamu TakizawaKanae NishiPaula MenyukLouis GoldsteinHosung NamAndrea G. LevittAngela Carpenter
- Topics
- Phonetics and Phonology Research (4 papers)Speech and Audio Processing (2 papers)Speech Recognition and Synthesis (2 papers)
- Cited by
- Experimental and Cognitive PsychologyLinguistics and LanguageDevelopmental and Educational Psychology
- Journals
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaJournal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Catherine Best
3 papers receiving 464 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 422
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 296
- Linguistics and Language 128
- Cognitive Neuroscience 119
- Artificial Intelligence 106
Countries citing papers authored by Catherine Best
This map shows the geographic impact of Catherine Best's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Catherine Best with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Catherine Best more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Catherine Best
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Catherine Best. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Catherine Best. The network helps show where Catherine Best may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Catherine Best
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Catherine Best. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Catherine Best based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Catherine Best. Catherine Best is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Distribution of tongue tip articulations in Hindi versus English and the acquisition of stop place categories | 2 |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 50 | |
| 4 | 454 |
About Catherine Best
Catherine Best is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Linguistics and Language and Pharmacy, having authored 4 papers that have together received 507 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phonetics and Phonology Research (4 papers), Speech and Audio Processing (2 papers) and Speech Recognition and Synthesis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (422 citations), Linguistics and Language (128 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (296 citations). Catherine Best has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Gerald W. McRoberts, Osamu Takizawa, Kanae Nishi, Paula Menyuk, Louis Goldstein, Hosung Nam, Andrea G. Levitt and Angela Carpenter. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America and Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.