A. M. Moser
Impact in
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Gender Politics and Representation
- Gender Diversity and Inequality
- Gender, Security, and Conflict
- Gender Roles and Identity Studies
- Development top 5%
- International Development and Aid
Papers in
-
- Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics 1
- Co-authors
- Caroline Moser (2 shared papers)Marianne Fay (1 shared paper)Ailsa Winton (1 shared paper)Michael D Tokach (1 shared paper)Robert F. Stott (1 shared paper)Robert D Goodband (1 shared paper)Jason T. Sawyer (1 shared paper)Jim L Nelssen (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Gender & Development (2 papers)Social movement studies (1 paper)Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (1 paper)Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesIndia
In The Last Decade
A. M. Moser
8 papers receiving 252 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Gender Studies 147
- Development 31
- Safety Research 37
- Sociology and Political Science 125
- Political Science and International Relations 62
Countries citing papers authored by A. M. Moser
This map shows the geographic impact of A. M. Moser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. M. Moser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. M. Moser more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by A. M. Moser
This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. M. Moser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. M. Moser. The network helps show where A. M. Moser may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 8 scholars most cited alongside A. M. Moser, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2005 | 238 | |
| 2 | GENDER and INDICATORS Overview Report | 2007 | 28 |
| 3 | Violence, Fear and Insecurity among the Urban Poor in Latin America | 2005 | 22 |
| 4 | 2003 | 9 | |
| 5 | 1998 | 6 | |
| 6 | 2007 | 4 | |
| 7 | Collection methods in dietary surveys. A comparison of the food list and record in two farming areas in the south. | 1952 | 2 |
| 8 | Use of food by farm families in the tobacco farming area of South Carolina. | 1953 | 1 |
About A. M. Moser
A. M. Moser is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies, General Health Professions, Health and Animal Science and Zoology, having authored 8 papers that have together received 310 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Tourism, Volunteerism, and Development (1 paper), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (1 paper), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (1 paper), Algal biology and biofuel production (1 paper), Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare (1 paper), Theatre and Performance Studies (1 paper), Pharmacological Effects and Assays (1 paper) and Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (147 citations), Development (31 citations), Safety Research (37 citations), Sociology and Political Science (125 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (62 citations). A. M. Moser has collaborated with scholars based in United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Caroline Moser, Marianne Fay, Ailsa Winton, Michael D Tokach, Robert F. Stott, Robert D Goodband, Jason T. Sawyer and Jim L Nelssen. Their work appears in journals such as Gender & Development, Social movement studies, Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) and Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.