Caroline Mohr

21 papers receiving 198 citations

Peers

Caroline Mohr
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Clinical Psychology 116
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 100
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 82
  • Genetics 46
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 33
Replace Stephen Read with:
Stephen Read United Kingdom
JoAnne Bielecki United States
Deborah M. Spitalnik United States
Bharati Limbu United Kingdom
Even Myrbakk Norway
B. Allyson Phillips United States
Neomi van Duijvenbode Netherlands
Andrea P. Cortés Hidalgo Netherlands
Sean Brophy United Kingdom
Yasmin I. Ahmadzadeh United Kingdom
Caroline Mohr relative to Stephen Read United Kingdom Stephen Read's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Stephen Read · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Caroline Mohr

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Caroline Mohr's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Caroline Mohr with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Caroline Mohr more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Caroline Mohr

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Caroline Mohr. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Caroline Mohr. The network helps show where Caroline Mohr may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Caroline Mohr

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Caroline Mohr. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Caroline Mohr based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Caroline Mohr. Caroline Mohr is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 1
2 6
3 17
4 7
5 10
6 9
7 7
8 81
9
The Developmental Behaviour Checklist for Adults: A new contribution to the assessment of psychopathology in people with intellectual disability
1
10
The Developmental Behaviour Checklist for Adults (DBC-A)
13
11 8
12
Les paradoxes du virage communautaire : le cas de la police de Laval
1
13
The assessment and treatment of behavioural problems.
3
14 11
15 13
16 4
17 10
18
Multi-Modal Treatment of Nocturnal Enuresis.
1
19 3
20 10

About Caroline Mohr

Caroline Mohr is a scholar working on Family Practice, Clinical Psychology and Safety Research, having authored 21 papers that have together received 217 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Family and Disability Support Research (6 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (4 papers) and Down syndrome and intellectual disability research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (116 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (82 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (100 citations). Caroline Mohr has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Stewart Einfeld, Bruce J. Tonge, Kylie M. Gray, John Taffe, Fiona Moffatt, David Ames, W. T. McKinney, R. Testa, Robert I. Davis and Larry Chapman. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Psychiatry, International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Journal of Intellectual Disability Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026