Stephen Read

676 total citations
11 papers, 207 citations indexed

About

Stephen Read is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Stephen Read has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 207 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 5 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 4 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Stephen Read's work include Down syndrome and intellectual disability research (5 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (5 papers) and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (2 papers). Stephen Read is often cited by papers focused on Down syndrome and intellectual disability research (5 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (5 papers) and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (2 papers). Stephen Read collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and United States. Stephen Read's co-authors include Simon Whitaker, Lilian Thorpe, Ilse Van Hove, Mariëlle Eerdekens, Tammi Walker, Mark F. Naylor and Leigh A. Thorpe and has published in prestigious journals such as The British Journal of Psychiatry, Psychopharmacology and Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities.

In The Last Decade

Stephen Read

10 papers receiving 190 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Stephen Read United Kingdom 6 113 110 76 51 37 11 207
Caroline Mohr Australia 9 100 0.9× 116 1.1× 82 1.1× 33 0.6× 46 1.2× 21 217
Geoff Marston United Kingdom 8 84 0.7× 115 1.0× 120 1.6× 56 1.1× 103 2.8× 14 288
Deborah M. Spitalnik United States 2 69 0.6× 108 1.0× 67 0.9× 47 0.9× 39 1.1× 5 252
S. Cooray United Kingdom 6 90 0.8× 90 0.8× 62 0.8× 43 0.8× 18 0.5× 8 165
JoAnne Bielecki United States 7 79 0.7× 133 1.2× 137 1.8× 89 1.7× 36 1.0× 9 274
Judith McBrien United Kingdom 9 87 0.8× 197 1.8× 42 0.6× 37 0.7× 25 0.7× 20 277
Anna M. Palucka Canada 10 64 0.6× 191 1.7× 146 1.9× 63 1.2× 15 0.4× 15 254
Bharati Limbu United Kingdom 11 123 1.1× 146 1.3× 159 2.1× 99 1.9× 46 1.2× 25 281
B. A. Benson United States 7 132 1.2× 225 2.0× 85 1.1× 23 0.5× 24 0.6× 9 301
Amber D. Rieder United States 7 75 0.7× 127 1.2× 86 1.1× 50 1.0× 18 0.5× 19 222

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Read

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Read's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Read with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Read more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Read

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Read. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Read. The network helps show where Stephen Read may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen Read

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen Read. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen Read based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen Read. Stephen Read is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
1.
Thorpe, Leigh A., et al.. (2008). Service User Satisfaction in a Low Secure Forensic Learning Disability Unit?. 5(2). 176–191. 9 indexed citations
2.
Read, Stephen. (2008). Learning Disabilities & Serious Crime: Murder. 5(1). 63–76.
3.
Naylor, Mark F., et al.. (2007). ‘Getting into trouble’: A qualitative analysis of the onset of offending in the accounts of men with learning disabilities. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology. 18(2). 221–234. 13 indexed citations
4.
Whitaker, Simon & Stephen Read. (2006). The Prevalence of Psychiatric Disorders among People with Intellectual Disabilities: An Analysis of the Literature. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities. 0(0). 2422813894–???. 5 indexed citations
5.
Whitaker, Simon & Stephen Read. (2006). The Prevalence of Psychiatric Disorders among People with Intellectual Disabilities: An Analysis of the Literature. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities. 19(4). 330–345. 105 indexed citations
6.
Read, Stephen, et al.. (2006). An Open‐Label Study of Risperidone in the Improvement of Quality of Life and Treatment of Symptoms of Violent and Self‐Injurious Behaviour in Adults with Intellectual Disability. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities. 20(3). 256–264. 4 indexed citations
7.
Read, Stephen, et al.. (2005). Short- and long-term efficacy and safety of risperidone in adults with disruptive behavior disorders. Psychopharmacology. 179(3). 629–636. 38 indexed citations
9.
Walker, Tammi, et al.. (2003). Caseload management in community learning disability teams. TeesRep (Teesside University). 7(4). 297–321. 13 indexed citations
10.
Read, Stephen. (1998). Self-injury and violence in people with severe learning disabilities. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 172(5). 381–384. 11 indexed citations
11.
Read, Stephen, et al.. (1997). Monitoring of patients on high dose antipsychotic medication. Psychiatric Bulletin. 21(10). 612–614. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026