Jo Thakker
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Social Psychology
- Health top 10%
- Co-authors
- Tony WardHannah Lena MerdianNick WilsonCate CurtisDouglas P. BoerTheresa A. GannonRachael M. CollieRussil Durrant
- Topics
- Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (13 papers)Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (7 papers)Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- New ZealandUnited KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
Jo Thakker
18 papers receiving 402 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Clinical Psychology 328
- Sociology and Political Science 236
- Gender Studies 111
- Social Psychology 77
- Health 56
Countries citing papers authored by Jo Thakker
This map shows the geographic impact of Jo Thakker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jo Thakker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jo Thakker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jo Thakker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jo Thakker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jo Thakker. The network helps show where Jo Thakker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jo Thakker
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jo Thakker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jo Thakker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jo Thakker. Jo Thakker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 40 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 28 | |
| 4 | “So why did you do it?” Explanations provided by child pornography offenders | 12 |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 46 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 12 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 31 | |
| 11 | 53 | |
| 12 | News Coverage of Sexual Offending in New Zealand, 2003 | 17 |
| 13 | A reevaluation of relapse prevention with adolescents who sexually offend : a Good-Lives Model | 19 |
| 14 | 16 | |
| 15 | Substance Use and Abuse: Cultural and Historical Perspectives | 45 |
| 16 | Culture and Cognitive Theory: Toward a Reformulation | 1 |
| 17 | 25 | |
| 18 | 75 |
About Jo Thakker
Jo Thakker is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Gender Studies and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 18 papers that have together received 452 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (13 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (7 papers) and Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (328 citations), Gender Studies (111 citations) and Health (56 citations). Jo Thakker has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Tony Ward, Hannah Lena Merdian, Nick Wilson, Cate Curtis, Douglas P. Boer, Theresa A. Gannon, Rachael M. Collie, Tony Ward, Russil Durrant and David L. Dawson. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Psychology Review, Sexual Abuse and Psychology Crime and Law.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.