Caroline Dombrowski

611 total citations
10 papers, 385 citations indexed

About

Caroline Dombrowski is a scholar working on Communication, Social Psychology and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Caroline Dombrowski has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 385 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Communication, 3 papers in Social Psychology and 3 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Caroline Dombrowski's work include Knowledge Management and Sharing (3 papers), Team Dynamics and Performance (3 papers) and Digital Games and Media (2 papers). Caroline Dombrowski is often cited by papers focused on Knowledge Management and Sharing (3 papers), Team Dynamics and Performance (3 papers) and Digital Games and Media (2 papers). Caroline Dombrowski collaborates with scholars based in United States, Slovenia and Finland. Caroline Dombrowski's co-authors include Jeffrey Y. Kim, Sridhar S. Papagari, Peter Baloh, Sanjeev Jha, Kevin C. Desouza, Yukika Awazu, Jeffrey Kim, Ashley Braganza, Wayne G. Lutters and Arnold M. Lund and has published in prestigious journals such as First Monday, Research-Technology Management and interactions.

In The Last Decade

Caroline Dombrowski

9 papers receiving 337 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Caroline Dombrowski United States	7	148	98	71	62	59	10	385
Jeffrey Y. Kim United States	6	149 1.0×	81 0.8×	74 1.0×	60 1.0×	60 1.0×	8	365
Sridhar S. Papagari United States	5	150 1.0×	64 0.7×	71 1.0×	59 1.0×	58 1.0×	7	322
Jason MacVaugh United Kingdom	8	118 0.8×	66 0.7×	35 0.5×	41 0.7×	52 0.9×	13	399
Amanda J. Porter Netherlands	10	87 0.6×	116 1.2×	50 0.7×	48 0.8×	45 0.8×	16	347
Danielle D. Dunne United States	7	284 1.9×	107 1.1×	60 0.8×	70 1.1×	92 1.6×	10	507
Thomas Kilian Germany	9	141 1.0×	126 1.3×	140 2.0×	58 0.9×	31 0.5×	33	420
Kashif Ullah Khan China	12	141 1.0×	121 1.2×	105 1.5×	74 1.2×	58 1.0×	41	521
Sladjana Nørskov Denmark	9	104 0.7×	94 1.0×	60 0.8×	31 0.5×	42 0.7×	16	387
Paola Cillo Italy	11	209 1.4×	85 0.9×	132 1.9×	58 0.9×	89 1.5×	22	487
Anh Nguyen Phillips United States	7	129 0.9×	73 0.7×	39 0.5×	58 0.9×	72 1.2×	7	397

Countries citing papers authored by Caroline Dombrowski

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Caroline Dombrowski's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Caroline Dombrowski with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Caroline Dombrowski more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Caroline Dombrowski

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Caroline Dombrowski. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Caroline Dombrowski. The network helps show where Caroline Dombrowski may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Caroline Dombrowski

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Caroline Dombrowski. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Caroline Dombrowski based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Caroline Dombrowski. Caroline Dombrowski is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Dombrowski, Caroline, Jeffrey Y. Kim, Jordan Eschler, & Wayne G. Lutters. (2013). Transcending Knowledge Gaps in Virtual Teams: Social Processes of Rapid Problem-Solving Bounded by Terminology. Americas Conference on Information Systems. 1 indexed citations

2.

Higdon, Roger, Elizabeth Stewart, Jared C. Roach, et al.. (2013). Predictive Analytics In Healthcare: Medications as a Predictor of Medical Complexity. Big Data. 1(4). 237–244. 12 indexed citations

3.

Kim, Jeffrey, et al.. (2013). Telling the story in big data. interactions. 20(3). 48–51. 7 indexed citations

4.

Young, Alyson L., et al.. (2012). Exploring infrastructure assemblage in volunteer virtual organizations. 2649–2654. 3 indexed citations

5.

Lutters, Wayne G., et al.. (2011). Designing the future of collaborative workplace systems. 174–180. 17 indexed citations

6.

Kim, Jeffrey, Arnold M. Lund, & Caroline Dombrowski. (2010). Mobilizing attention. interactions. 17(2). 24–26. 6 indexed citations

7.

Desouza, Kevin C., Caroline Dombrowski, Yukika Awazu, et al.. (2009). Crafting organizational innovation processes. Innovation. 11(1). 6–33. 64 indexed citations

8.

Kim, Jeffrey, et al.. (2009). Storytelling in new media: The case of alternate reality games, 2001–2009. First Monday. 39 indexed citations

9.

Desouza, Kevin C., Yukika Awazu, Sanjeev Jha, et al.. (2008). Customer-Driven Innovation. Research-Technology Management. 51(3). 35–44. 132 indexed citations

10.

Dombrowski, Caroline, Jeffrey Y. Kim, Kevin C. Desouza, et al.. (2007). Elements of innovative cultures. Knowledge and Process Management. 14(3). 190–202. 104 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact