Caroline Brett

553 total citations
11 papers, 389 citations indexed

About

Caroline Brett is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Philosophy and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Caroline Brett has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 389 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health, 7 papers in Philosophy and 4 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Caroline Brett's work include Mental Health and Psychiatry (7 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (7 papers) and Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (6 papers). Caroline Brett is often cited by papers focused on Mental Health and Psychiatry (7 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (7 papers) and Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (6 papers). Caroline Brett collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and Canada. Caroline Brett's co-authors include Emmanuelle Peters, Philip McGuire, Louise Johns, Charlie Heriot-Maitland, Oliver Mason, Lucia Valmaggia, P. Tabraham, Paul L. Harris, María Núñez and Oliver Howes and has published in prestigious journals such as The British Journal of Psychiatry, Psychological Medicine and The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease.

In The Last Decade

Caroline Brett

11 papers receiving 364 citations

Peers

Caroline Brett

PMH

PHILO

ECP

CP

SP

Yvonne Linney United Kingdom

Paulo de Tarso Xavier Sousa Brazil

Jennifer Laing United Kingdom

Marie-Luise Kesting Germany

Kelsey Ludwig United States

Charles McCreery United Kingdom

Henry R. Cowan United States

Lisa Liebke Germany

Emily C. Gagen United States

Eva Lüllmann Germany

Yvonne Linney United Kingdom

Caroline Brett

293 ×1.2

PMH

145 ×1.0

PHILO

160 ×1.4

ECP

149 ×1.3

CP

62 ×0.8

SP

Citations per year, relative to Caroline Brett Caroline Brett (= 1×) peers Yvonne Linney

Countries citing papers authored by Caroline Brett

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Caroline Brett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Caroline Brett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Caroline Brett more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Caroline Brett

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Caroline Brett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Caroline Brett. The network helps show where Caroline Brett may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Caroline Brett

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Caroline Brett. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Caroline Brett based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Caroline Brett. Caroline Brett is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

Heriot-Maitland, Charlie, et al.. (2023). Detecting anomalous experiences in the community: The Transpersonal Experiences Questionnaire ( TEQ ). Psychology and Psychotherapy Theory Research and Practice. 96(2). 383–398. 5 indexed citations

2.

Cooke, Anne & Caroline Brett. (2019). Clinical psychologists' use of transformative models of psychosis. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy. 27(1). 87–96. 1 indexed citations

3.

Brett, Caroline, Emmanuelle Peters, & Philip McGuire. (2015). Which psychotic experiences are associated with a need for clinical care?. European Psychiatry. 30(5). 648–654. 16 indexed citations

4.

Goghari, Vina M., Caroline Brett, P. Tabraham, et al.. (2014). Spatial working memory ability in individuals at ultra high risk for psychosis. Journal of Psychiatric Research. 50. 100–105. 25 indexed citations

5.

Brett, Caroline, Charlie Heriot-Maitland, Philip McGuire, & Emmanuelle Peters. (2013). Predictors of distress associated with psychotic‐like anomalous experiences in clinical and non‐clinical populations. British Journal of Clinical Psychology. 53(2). 213–227. 75 indexed citations

6.

Mason, Oliver, et al.. (2010). Psychotic-Like Experiences, Appraisals, and Trauma. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease. 198(11). 813–819. 62 indexed citations

7.

Brett, Caroline, Louise Johns, Emmanuelle Peters, & Philip McGuire. (2008). The role of metacognitive beliefs in determining the impact of anomalous experiences: a comparison of help-seeking and non-help-seeking groups of people experiencing psychotic-like anomalies. Psychological Medicine. 39(6). 939–950. 63 indexed citations

8.

Brett, Caroline, Emmanuelle Peters, Louise Johns, et al.. (2007). Appraisals of Anomalous Experiences Interview (AANEX): a multidimensional measure of psychological responses to anomalies associated with psychosis. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 191(S51). s23–s30. 69 indexed citations

9.

Brett, Caroline. (2002). Psychotic and Mystical States of Being: Connections and Distinctions. Philosophy, psychiatry & psychology. 9(4). 321–341. 33 indexed citations

10.

Brett, Caroline. (2002). Spiritual Experience and Psychopathology: Dichotomy or Interaction?. Philosophy, psychiatry & psychology. 9(4). 373–380. 5 indexed citations

11.

Harris, Paul L., María Núñez, & Caroline Brett. (2001). Let’s swap: Early understanding of social exchange by British and Nepali children. Memory & Cognition. 29(5). 757–764. 35 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact