Carla Bagnoli
- Philosophy top 2%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Emanuela Ceva
- Topics
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory (23 papers)Political Philosophy and Ethics (12 papers)Free Will and Agency (10 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEThe Philosophical Review
- Partner nations
- ItalyNorwayUnited States
In The Last Decade
Carla Bagnoli
42 papers receiving 230 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
- Philosophy 166
- Cognitive Neuroscience 91
- Political Science and International Relations 55
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 45
- Sociology and Political Science 39
Countries citing papers authored by Carla Bagnoli
This map shows the geographic impact of Carla Bagnoli's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Carla Bagnoli with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Carla Bagnoli more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Carla Bagnoli
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Carla Bagnoli. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Carla Bagnoli. The network helps show where Carla Bagnoli may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Carla Bagnoli
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Carla Bagnoli. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Carla Bagnoli based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Carla Bagnoli. Carla Bagnoli is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | Vulnerability and the Incompleteness of Practical Reason | 4 |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 14 | |
| 11 | Che fare? Nuove prospettive filosofiche sull'azione | 0 |
| 12 | Self-Deception and Agential Authority. A Constitutivist Account | 3 |
| 13 | Constructivism in Meta-ethics | 18 |
| 14 | Moral Perception and Knowledge by Principles | 2 |
| 15 | 16 | |
| 16 | Review of Charles Lamore The Autonomy of Morality | 1 |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | Rispetto, reciprocità e eguaglianza democratica | 1 |
| 19 | 19 | |
| 20 | Rawls on the Objectivity of Practical Reason | 1 |
About Carla Bagnoli
Carla Bagnoli is a scholar working on Philosophy, Industrial relations and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 47 papers that have together received 264 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophical Ethics and Theory (23 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (12 papers) and Free Will and Agency (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (166 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (91 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (45 citations). Carla Bagnoli has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Norway and United States. Frequent co-authors include Emanuela Ceva. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and The Philosophical Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.