Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of Carl Schmitt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Carl Schmitt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Carl Schmitt more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Carl Schmitt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Carl Schmitt. The network helps show where Carl Schmitt may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Carl Schmitt
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Carl Schmitt.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Carl Schmitt based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Carl Schmitt. Carl Schmitt is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Anheier, Helmut K., Hubertus Buchstein, Dorothea Kübler, et al.. (2016). Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis. Leviathan. 44(4). 483–484.1 indexed citations
Schmitt, Carl, et al.. (2005). Carl Schmitt : die Militarzeit 1915 bis 1919 : Tagebuch Februar bis Dezember 1915 : Aufsätze und Materialien.1 indexed citations
7.
Schmitt, Carl, et al.. (2003). La valeur de l'État et la signification de l'individu. Droz eBooks.1 indexed citations
8.
Schmitt, Carl, et al.. (2003). Ex captivitate salus : expériences des années 1945-1947.1 indexed citations
9.
Schmitt, Carl, et al.. (2003). Tagebücher : Oktober 1912 bis Februar 1915. Akademie Verlag eBooks.2 indexed citations
10.
Schmitt, Carl, et al.. (2002). Le Léviathan dans la doctrine de l'état de Thomas Hobbes : sens et échec d'un symbole politique. Seuil eBooks.1 indexed citations
11.
Schmitt, Carl, et al.. (2000). Jugendbriefe : Briefschaften an seine Schwester Auguste 1905 bis 1913. Akademie Verlag eBooks.1 indexed citations
12.
Schmitt, Carl, et al.. (2000). Carl Schmitt : Antworten in Nürnberg. Duncker & Humblot eBooks.1 indexed citations
13.
Jünger, Ernst, et al.. (1999). Ernst Jünger, Carl Schmitt : Briefe 1930-1983. Klett-Cotta eBooks.4 indexed citations
14.
Schmitt, Carl. (1996). LA VISIBILIDAD DE LA IGLESIA. UNA REFLEXIÓN ESCOLÁSTICA. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 11–20.
15.
Schmitt, Carl & Julien Freund. (1992). La notion de politique ; Théorie du partisan. Flammarion eBooks.9 indexed citations
16.
Schwab, George, Carl Schmitt, & Franco Ferrarotti. (1986). Carl Schmitt, la sfida dell'eccezione. Laterza eBooks.3 indexed citations
17.
Schmitt, Carl. (1979). La revolución legal mundial. Revista de Estudios Políticos. 5–24.2 indexed citations
18.
Schmitt, Carl. (1969). Clausewitz como pensador político o el honor de Prusia. Revista de Estudios Políticos. 5–30.3 indexed citations
19.
Schmitt, Carl, et al.. (1963). Interpretación Europea de Donoso Cortes. Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa).1 indexed citations
20.
Schmitt, Carl. (1954). Coloquio sobre el poder y sobre el acceso al poderoso. Revista de Estudios Políticos. 3–20.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.