G. L. Ulmen

2.0k citations
37 papers · 764 indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 8
Topics
Political Theology and Sovereignty (13 papers)German legal, social, and political studies (4 papers)Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (4 papers)

In The Last Decade

G. L. Ulmen

28 papers receiving 546 citations

Hit Papers

The nomos of the earth in the international law of the Ju...20032026201020182003100200300400

Peers

G. L. Ulmen
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Sociology and Political Science 475
  • Political Science and International Relations 314
  • Philosophy 179
  • History 72
  • Literature and Literary Theory 56
Replace Uday S. Mehta with:
Uday S. Mehta United States
Stanley G. Payne United States
Michael Scrivener United States
Sudipta Kaviraj United Kingdom
Robert Eric Frykenberg United States
Barbara Arneil Canada
Perry Miller United States
Sumathi Ramaswamy United States
Nicholas V. Riasanovsky United States
J. W. Burrow United Kingdom
G. L. Ulmen relative to Uday S. Mehta United States Uday S. Mehta's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Uday S. Mehta · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by G. L. Ulmen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. L. Ulmen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. L. Ulmen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. L. Ulmen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. L. Ulmen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. L. Ulmen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. L. Ulmen. The network helps show where G. L. Ulmen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. L. Ulmen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. L. Ulmen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. L. Ulmen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with G. L. Ulmen. G. L. Ulmen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1
Uses and Abuses of Carl Schmitt
5
2
Carl Schmitt and Donoso Cortés
2
3
Between the Weimar Republic and the Third Reich: Continuity in Carl Schmitt's Thought
0
4 107
5 7
6 1
7 0
8 2
9 1
10 1
11 6
12 2
13 1
14 0
15 5
16 7
17 1
18 3
19 3
20
The science of society
41

About G. L. Ulmen

G. L. Ulmen is a scholar working on Philosophy, Political Science and International Relations and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 37 papers that have together received 764 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Theology and Sovereignty (13 papers), German legal, social, and political studies (4 papers) and Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (179 citations), Political Science and International Relations (314 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (475 citations). Frequent co-authors include Carl Schmitt, Pierre Hégy, Karl A. Wittfogel, David Félix, Paul Piccone, P. Piccone, Graeme Gill and Paul Gottfried. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Antipode and Review of Religious Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026