This map shows the geographic impact of Carl Pacini's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Carl Pacini with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Carl Pacini more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Carl Pacini. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Carl Pacini. The network helps show where Carl Pacini may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Carl Pacini
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Carl Pacini.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Carl Pacini based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Carl Pacini. Carl Pacini is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Pacini, Carl, et al.. (2020). Investigating Healthcare Fraud: Its Scope, Applicable Laws, and Regulations. eYLS (Yale Law School). 11(2). 479.3 indexed citations
Pacini, Carl, et al.. (2013). The shareholder wealth effects of auditor changes and auditor opinions: Does a difference exist in a pre-sox versus post-SOX environment?. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies journal. 17(4). 29.2 indexed citations
4.
Pacini, Carl. (2012). The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act: Taking A Bite Out Of Bribery In International Business Transactions. Fordham journal of corporate & financial law. 17(2). 545.9 indexed citations
5.
Hillison, William & Carl Pacini. (2004). Auditor reputation and the insurance hypothesis: The information content of disclosures of financial distress of a major accounting firm. Journal of managerial issues. 16(1). 65.11 indexed citations
6.
Pacini, Carl, et al.. (2004). Attorney-Client Privilege: CPAs and the E-Frontier; CPAs Performing Litigation Support Must Be Careful Not to Inadvertently Waive Privilege. Journal of accountancy online/Journal of accountancy. 197(4). 64.1 indexed citations
Pacini, Carl, et al.. (2004). Attorney-client privilege: CPAs and the E-frontier. Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida).1 indexed citations
9.
Pacini, Carl, et al.. (2003). The market impact of the financial services modernization act of 1999: Differences between life insurers and property-liability insurers. Journal of Insurance Issues. 26(2). 69–92.2 indexed citations
Pacini, Carl, et al.. (2000). SysTrust and third-party risk. Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida). 190(2). 73.3 indexed citations
14.
Pacini, Carl, et al.. (2000). Insurer stock price responses to the disclosure of revised insured loss estimates after the 1994 Northridge earthquake. Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida). 23(2). 103–123.5 indexed citations
15.
Hillison, William & Carl Pacini. (2000). What's happened to auditing?. Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance. 11(4). 3–10.5 indexed citations
16.
Hillison, William, et al.. (2000). The insurance firm internal auditor as fraud-buster. Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida).3 indexed citations
Pacini, Carl, et al.. (1999). The Law and CPA WebTrust. Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida). 187(2). 20.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.