Carl Hoefer

30 papers receiving 428 citations

Peers

Carl Hoefer
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • History and Philosophy of Science 302
  • Theoretical Computer Science 29
  • Philosophy 144
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 169
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 132
Replace Richard Healey with:
Richard Healey United States
Juha Saatsi United Kingdom
Gordon Belot United States
Frederik Müller Netherlands
Frank Arntzenius United States
Nick Huggett United States
Wayne C. Myrvold Canada
Miklós Rédei Hungary
Storrs McCall Canada
Christopher Pincock United States
Carl Hoefer relative to Richard Healey United States Richard Healey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Richard Healey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Carl Hoefer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Carl Hoefer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Carl Hoefer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Carl Hoefer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Carl Hoefer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Carl Hoefer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Carl Hoefer. The network helps show where Carl Hoefer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Carl Hoefer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Carl Hoefer Line = papers co-authored together Carl Hoefer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20211
2 20214
3
Realism, Reference and Perspective
20203
4 202011
5 20190
6 201811
7 20152
8 20156
9 20112
10 20071
11 2007109
12
Absolute and Relational Space and Motion: Post-Newtonian Theories
20062
13 200316
14 20028
15 200041
16 199822
17 199713
18 1996102
19 199451
20 199420

About Carl Hoefer

Carl Hoefer is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Theoretical Computer Science, General Decision Sciences, Philosophy and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 520 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and History of Science (19 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (12 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (8 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (7 papers), Relativity and Gravitational Theory (7 papers), History and Theory of Mathematics (4 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (2 papers) and Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (302 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (29 citations), Philosophy (144 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (169 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (132 citations). Carl Hoefer has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Alexander Rosenberg, Roman Frigg, Genoveva Martí, Nick Huggett, Chris Smeenk, Alexander Krauß, Mauro Dorato, Christopher Ray and James Read. Their work appears in journals such as Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, Philosophy of Science and Mind.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026